The human

The human is a fragile being, and emotions are most generally evolving in opposition to technology. Hence, for the æther of Religion and œther of Science, Emotions (ælementium), and Logic (œlementium) arise as the prima materia from this medium. The more technocratic is an Ethos, the weaker are the folk that are born from it, however a select group of people stemming from the perfecting of the available tools emerge, the new society. Humans apart from this group search for God, in this sense—and most generally—as a way to overcome death in their inherent weakness.

“The privilege of a lifetime is to become who you truly are” — Carl Jung

However, due to simplicity, or poor availability of methods to find themselves, the human lurks alone without Ethosophy to guide the path. Henceforth, for most people their deep awakening is a lackluster, such that it is duty of the technology enacted by Zeus, to allow for this discovery.

The main objective truth of the modern human’s personality is that it revolves around the conscious decision of what to do with the time it was given to them, when one realizes that, it shall progressively fit in onto the categorical archetypes of the table below:

• The Naturalist
• The Religious
• The Politician

Each represent their own forms of presenting the equation, as humans seek to grow, they find comfort in their own possessions as a reason to be, such that each category will represent a flavor of objects that regulate their social affairs.

“Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times”— G. Michael Hopf

This has always been the case, however, with the vanity of the ultramodern human, Enantiodromia has caused several outstanding shifts, that war has become more unforgivable, and that death less accepted as a reason of glory for a person’s own path, but rather of their Nation. This behavior breaks the natural path of life, as the new society shifts from the ordinary to the extraordinary way, of which damages æœn by the detrimental intake of ælementium into œlementium.

To restore this equilibrium is to enact a path to be taken, and it is certainly a dance with blades, as to live, one requires a great will; and too be certain of such path, even more—but much more so to willingly procure death and in it find a reason to live. Therefore, that toolkits are presented as a solution for that path, without succumbing to the society of death we created as means to embed value to time, as the clock ticks and one meets its demise, only then will they understand beyond Gaian mechanics. It should be that all should have the chance to live without committing their lives to a task, but rather that they still gain the same moral that of a society of death has to offer as a way

While in the topic, it has been documented by several religions of the afterlife process, however, so far as is intelligible, the human still remains after their time is over, as it is not a process of afterlife as much as is a process of living and thereafter dying, of aftertime.

The table below perfectly express it:

• The Scientist
• The Institution
• The God

Nature and Men are modified by the artificial evolution of Homo Sapiens, either are respectively seen by the Scientist and the Institution. As is known, the assets an organization acquires is divided by their members in many tangible and intangible ways, paving the way for the new society to grow. Furthermore, the assets of nature behave the very same way, harnessed by the scientist that studies and applies them through technology. It is in fact a curious subject, the ego:

"Then, the three most dreaded trials of this purgatory for those who conquer are death, destiny, and dreams.” da Silva on the three trials

Albeit Zeus search for the theory of Everything—while regarding that ‘All quanta of one’s belief system must be universally true’ seen further on AEO—it does not look to describe death—the end of the journey— as it understands ‘to it nothing must be true’, hence it is a theory of life, and reasoning of God, and Animism to the present moment of Ethos. In this sense the evolution to Ethos is the path of ego, and the three trials aforementioned, that of the susceptibility the new society has to desire in remaining eternally and knowing infinitely, hence a form of afterlife.

The mind is indeed a wonderful machine, as knowledge not only of death but of any subject will be influenced by the degree of discovery one has towards a system. It is of belief that—besides for the meaning attributed to Om, heaven is a place of afterlife and good, where the chosen may stay and have their non-accomplished desires fulfilled, but, as so the purgatory points, it is no more than the process of discovery of the Epopee, that of the eternal state of the qualities sought by men, by maturing, while mastering them.

Illustration of the Vitruvian man by Leonardo da Vinci.

“Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.” — François-Marie Arouet

Most must fail in order to some succeed. However, failing is not linear as it can be also seen through small deviations in behavior—mistakes rather, the slightest of protrusions are opportunities, and they will happen as a form of karma. It is, then, that this all-encompassing Deux, judges us due to these qualities, giving us authority towards the new society.

At last, creativity is discussed because it is the most authentic human characteristic that humans exhibit naturally, giving form to the new society, and bias to failing. It is a way to understand the internal and compare it to the external, by expressing, hence, iconographies, paintings, etc. towards the unconscious collective.

The Lewis model looks to describe countries based on their control over emotion and logic, a good example of ælementium and œlementium and of help when describing the Government.

The Lewis model looks to describe countries based on their control over emotion and logic, a good example of ælementium and œlementium and of help when describing the Government.

They correctly describe an operating model on the behavior of mind; however, it does not give information of why the forms of which are perceived by the human geometry are in such a way. Henceforth, not a true geometry. The Vitruvian man in this sense represents the closest da Silva has seen to a true geometry, in this case, as it relies on the ambiguous perfection of the man and the mathematics of nature perceived by them. However closest to truth it grasps what it is known as an Analytics value, such that it synthesizes Zeus without having as its core, the framework.

Both at their core display failure gracefully, as no capable method of communication elapsed by men can possibly communicate truth other than Zeus, however, they gracefully display the system by which humans have enacted to show each other acceptance on proof of reproduction, of which is a characteristic of Ethosophy as a founding parameter of the human and its path towards death.