Main Page: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''''Zeus''''' is a [[wikipedia:Free_content|free-content]] [[wikipedia:Online_encyclopedia|online encyclopedia]], built using ''MediaWiki''. Established in 2020 by ''Eduard da Silva'', '''''Zeus''''' serves as a premier [[wikipedia:Reference_work|reference work]] on '''Artificial Intelligence''' <ref>AI and Philosophy: [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4656485 Exploring the Complex Relationship between Worldviews and Technology Development for an Inclusive and Ethical Future]. SSRN. December 6, 2023. Retrieved on February 5, 2025.</ref> <ref>[https://ide.mit.edu/insights/is-philosophy-the-next-llm-training-frontier Is Philosophy the Next LLM Training Frontier?]. MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. December 3, 2024. Retrieved in February 5, 2025</ref> that explores [[wikipedia:Infrastructure|infrastructure]] and [[wikipedia:Technical_communication|technical communication]] through [[wikipedia:Open_collaboration|open collaboration]]. Setting outstanding goals to create an [[wikipedia:Software_engine|engine]] capable of '''reasoning''', this Encyclopedia dives deep into core components of [[wikipedia:Algorithm|algorithms]] and [[wikipedia:Language|language]]. | '''''Zeus''''' is a [[wikipedia:Free_content|free-content]] [[wikipedia:Online_encyclopedia|online encyclopedia]], built using ''MediaWiki''. Established in 2020 by ''Eduard da Silva'', '''''Zeus''''' serves as a premier [[wikipedia:Reference_work|reference work]] on '''Artificial Intelligence''' <ref>AI and Philosophy: [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4656485 Exploring the Complex Relationship between Worldviews and Technology Development for an Inclusive and Ethical Future]. SSRN. December 6, 2023. Retrieved on February 5, 2025.</ref> <ref>[https://ide.mit.edu/insights/is-philosophy-the-next-llm-training-frontier Is Philosophy the Next LLM Training Frontier?]. MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. December 3, 2024. Retrieved in February 5, 2025</ref> that explores [[wikipedia:Infrastructure|infrastructure]] and [[wikipedia:Technical_communication|technical communication]] through [[wikipedia:Open_collaboration|open collaboration]]. Setting outstanding goals to create an [[wikipedia:Software_engine|engine]] capable of '''reasoning''', this Encyclopedia dives deep into core components of [[wikipedia:Algorithm|algorithms]] and [[wikipedia:Language|language]]. | ||
'''''Zeus''''' follows certain fundamental principles that shape its structure and purpose. They ensure that the information presented remains coherent, rigorous, and aligned with the broader vision of the system. | |||
==== Guiding Principles ==== | ==== Guiding Principles ==== | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
In the modern era, the process of [[wikipedia:Discovery_(observation)|discovery]] has '''stagnated''', as humanity has entered a '''critical state of complexity''' <ref>To Science, the dominance of reductionism has driven progress since the Scientific Revolution. However, this approach has fostered a siloed structure, where fields operate independently. This lack of interconnectedness hinders our ability to address complex, interdisciplinary challenges. Fragmentation obstructs solutions to new scientifical breaktrough , which demand collaboration across disciplines. It also constrains our understanding of reality, as gaps persist between domains such as physics and neuroscience. Mechanistic worldviews, focused on isolated phenomena, fail to account for emergent properties.</ref>. The [[wikipedia:Technology|technological]] systems that underpin society have grown so advanced that '''the act of developing knowledge''' and '''the act of executing it''' have diverged entirely. Progress, once measured by new insights, is now dictated by the ability to navigate pre-existing systems rather than creating new paradigms. The ideological dominance of '''Atheism dissolved trough the Ocidental culture''' <ref>Atheism, once a fringe position, has become a '''dominant intellectual force''' in Western culture, largely due to '''scientific advancements, philosophical materialism, and secular governance'''. From Greek rationalism to the Enlightenment and modern secular humanism, the West has systematically challenged religious authority, promoting reason, empiricism, and '''individual autonomy''' over faith-based worldviews.</ref>, framed as the propagation of progress, has inadvertently shaped '''a culture of intellectual pride''', where the ego is overwhelmed by the power of a new form of '''"Creationism"—that of the mind'''. | In the modern era, the process of [[wikipedia:Discovery_(observation)|discovery]] has '''stagnated''', as humanity has entered a '''critical state of complexity''' <ref>To Science, the dominance of reductionism has driven progress since the Scientific Revolution. However, this approach has fostered a siloed structure, where fields operate independently. This lack of interconnectedness hinders our ability to address complex, interdisciplinary challenges. Fragmentation obstructs solutions to new scientifical breaktrough , which demand collaboration across disciplines. It also constrains our understanding of reality, as gaps persist between domains such as physics and neuroscience. Mechanistic worldviews, focused on isolated phenomena, fail to account for emergent properties.</ref>. The [[wikipedia:Technology|technological]] systems that underpin society have grown so advanced that '''the act of developing knowledge''' and '''the act of executing it''' have diverged entirely. Progress, once measured by new insights, is now dictated by the ability to navigate pre-existing systems rather than creating new paradigms. The ideological dominance of '''Atheism dissolved trough the Ocidental culture''' <ref>Atheism, once a fringe position, has become a '''dominant intellectual force''' in Western culture, largely due to '''scientific advancements, philosophical materialism, and secular governance'''. From Greek rationalism to the Enlightenment and modern secular humanism, the West has systematically challenged religious authority, promoting reason, empiricism, and '''individual autonomy''' over faith-based worldviews.</ref>, framed as the propagation of progress, has inadvertently shaped '''a culture of intellectual pride''', where the ego is overwhelmed by the power of a new form of '''"Creationism"—that of the mind'''. | ||
While further developed in the [[Signe]] segment, is important to note how [[wikipedia:Sanity|sanity]] is a widely recognized and important subject of Psychology <ref>'''Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2006).''' [https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-02176-002 Intelligence testing with divergent thinking tasks: A double-edged sword]. ''The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40''(1), 1–3.</ref>. Paired with aforementioned political affairs of men, there is little room to discuss the [[wikipedia:Supernatural|supernatural]] without generally resorting to arguments of hallucinatory experience <ref>Larøi, F., Luhrmann, T. M., Bell, V., Christian, W. A., Deshpande, S., Fernyhough, C., Jenkins, J., & Woods, A. (2014). [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4141319/ Culture and hallucinations: Overview and future directions]. ''Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40''(Suppl 4), S213–S220. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbu012</nowiki></ref> <ref>Pechey, R., & Halligan, P. (2011). [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21196811/ The prevalence of delusion-like beliefs relative to sociocultural beliefs in the general population]. ''Psychopathology, 44''(2), 106–115. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1159/000319788</nowiki></ref>. As a tenet | While further developed in the [[Signe]] segment, is important to note how [[wikipedia:Sanity|sanity]] is a widely recognized and important subject of Psychology <ref>'''Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2006).''' [https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-02176-002 Intelligence testing with divergent thinking tasks: A double-edged sword]. ''The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40''(1), 1–3.</ref>. Paired with aforementioned political affairs of men, there is little room to discuss the [[wikipedia:Supernatural|supernatural]] without generally resorting to arguments of hallucinatory experience <ref>Larøi, F., Luhrmann, T. M., Bell, V., Christian, W. A., Deshpande, S., Fernyhough, C., Jenkins, J., & Woods, A. (2014). [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4141319/ Culture and hallucinations: Overview and future directions]. ''Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40''(Suppl 4), S213–S220. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbu012</nowiki></ref> <ref>Pechey, R., & Halligan, P. (2011). [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21196811/ The prevalence of delusion-like beliefs relative to sociocultural beliefs in the general population]. ''Psychopathology, 44''(2), 106–115. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1159/000319788</nowiki></ref>. As a tenet point of '''''Zeus''''', that prior to the dawn of the Roman Empire <ref>Albeit a complex topic on its own, it is to note that the prophecy of Jesus, and its close tie to the Roman Empire is related as a major shift in societal behavior, as the Anno Domini marked the beginning of a new world. This is fourthly developed in [[The man and the empire]], however, and notably, a deep and intricate subject of this research. Even so, the argument can be discarded for sake of congruency, as the pre-modern man ''in general'' would be liable of such effect, and therefore that it is a delicacy of the structure of the research that the Middle Ages are not affected by such argument.</ref>, language was primarily a tool for articulating the ''animistic'' nature of matter <ref>'''Conceptual Foundations:''' | ||
'''Jungian Psychology:''' The ''anima'' represents the unconscious projection of life onto external objects. | '''Jungian Psychology:''' The ''anima'' represents the unconscious projection of life onto external objects. | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
'''Animism:''' Indigenous traditions view all things—living and non-living—as possessing '''a spirit or consciousness''', shaping early worldviews. | '''Animism:''' Indigenous traditions view all things—living and non-living—as possessing '''a spirit or consciousness''', shaping early worldviews. | ||
'''Mysticism (Mistic):''' The author expands animism by incorporating '''esoteric and supernatural forces''', suggesting that matter serves as '''a bridge between the physical and metaphysical realms'''.</ref> <ref>One good example of such, is the [[wikipedia:Aegis#In_Greek_mythology|Aegis]]. Generally, anima is described by the yielding of tools forged by the Gods, that possess powers beyond common matter.</ref>. This is directly tied to the '''description of miracles,''' [[wikipedia:Magic_(supernatural)|magic]], and the '''formation of Canon Law'''—not as a spiritual doctrine alone, but as '''a structural necessity for maintaining''' [[wikipedia:Reality|reality]]. Similarly, hallucinations, rather than being understood as psychological phenomena, were perceived as the primary propagation mechanism of supernatural ''energy'' <ref>While on the topic of energy, this encyclopedia aims to broaden the connection between Relativistic Mechanics and human cognition. Special Relativity redefined energy by establishing its intrinsic link to mass and spacetime, demonstrating that energy is '''not an independent force''', but a property governed by physical laws, which may also have implications for '''understanding perception, consciousness, and the structure of thought'''. They are developed on [[ | '''Mysticism (Mistic):''' The author expands animism by incorporating '''esoteric and supernatural forces''', suggesting that matter serves as '''a bridge between the physical and metaphysical realms'''.</ref> <ref>One good example of such, is the [[wikipedia:Aegis#In_Greek_mythology|Aegis]]. Generally, anima is described by the yielding of tools forged by the Gods, that possess powers beyond common matter.</ref>. This is directly tied to the '''description of miracles,''' [[wikipedia:Magic_(supernatural)|magic]], and the '''formation of Canon Law'''—not as a spiritual doctrine alone, but as '''a structural necessity for maintaining''' [[wikipedia:Reality|reality]]. Similarly, hallucinations, rather than being understood as psychological phenomena, were perceived as the primary propagation mechanism of supernatural ''energy'' <ref>While on the topic of energy, this encyclopedia aims to broaden the connection between Relativistic Mechanics and human cognition. Special Relativity redefined energy by establishing its intrinsic link to mass and spacetime, demonstrating that energy is '''not an independent force''', but a property governed by physical laws, which may also have implications for '''understanding perception, consciousness, and the structure of thought'''. They are developed on [[The Boltzmann Brain Argument]], however it is to note that special relativity states that the laws of physics are the same for '''all observers in uniform motion''' and that time and space are not absolute but '''interconnected as "spacetime'''." It also demonstrates that the speed of light is constant for all observers. This is inconsistent, however, with the aforementioned societal shift. It is important to address '''the dilation of knowledge over time''' not as a mere physical process, but rather as an integrated system where '''condensed space,''' i.e., matter, refers not only to '''gravitational lensing''' but also to the encoding quality of physical laws as their '''animosity''' state change over spacetime. A great argument for this excerpt can be found on [[Dark Matter & Energy]] topic.</ref>''.'' | ||
* If Archetypes are the '''universal cognitive structures''' that shape the '''collective unconscious''', guiding human perception and behavior, then [[Alchetypes]] are their '''externalized counterparts''', where | * If [[wikipedia:Archetype|Archetypes]] are the '''universal cognitive structures''' that shape the '''collective unconscious''', guiding human perception and behavior, then '''[[Alchetypes]] are their''' '''externalized counterparts''', where '''animosity and extelligence''' operate through the same environment'''.''' | ||
The scientific academia, the business enterprise, and self-pride that | The [[wikipedia:Academy|scientific academia]], the [[wikipedia:Business|business enterprise]], and the '''self-pride''' that accompanies success—attributed to both sources of advancement—are '''reflections of the behavioral structures of the [[Acropolis]]'''. The power vested in [[wikipedia:Authority|authorities]], along with the demonstrations of mastery perpetuated by global media, reveals a pattern: despite vast political and cultural differences, '''humanity remains driven by the need for proof of reproduction'''—be it biological, intellectual, or structural. | ||
But why is this so? How can we '''redefine individual space, progression, and execution''' in a way that respects the '''individualism shaped by the modern era'''? And more importantly, '''why are Alchetypes integral to this engine?''' | |||
=== Our goals === | === Our goals === | ||
When stagnant, | When societies become stagnant, they inevitably drift toward chaos <ref>ref</ref>, leading to war—whether direct or indirect—'''conquest is intrinsic to human nature'''. The very argument that sustains an '''everlasting process of discovery''' is the same that upholds [[wikipedia:Zeitgeist|zeitgeist]] <ref>lorem</ref>: if governments seek to instill an ideal of such magnitude <ref>That of Atheism, and Occidentalism.</ref>, they must possess the '''intelligence to navigate cultural and technological trends effectively,''' in its scope, to develop nature-inspired design'''.''' However, it is hard to define nature on itself <ref>lorem</ref> <ref>external ref</ref>. | ||
This is '''Zeus'''—a system that supports [[Lux]], by allowing the comprehension Nature as a living entity, and thus offering ways to surpass the ill-based network of globalization the 21<sup>st</sup> century has been experiencing, while remaining akin to the modern man. See [[Avatar]], [[The Hub]] and [[XR]] for further insights. | |||
* This methodology is based on Thread & Tradition <ref>lorem</ref>. | |||
* It relies on the logic that digital worlds will be the best way to overcome overpopulation, poverty, psychological warfare, and many other stagnant issues of the current era by relying on free space <ref>Free space refers to areas used by society that categorize on leisure or otherwise, non-categorized at all. They oftentimes are limited by, if not exclusive to transit, sitting, or serve as infrastructure for trivial objects (discarding pottery or yards, that are too categorized as such but non-trivial).</ref> as means to expand our societal areas of contact. | |||
Notably, so far as religion is introduced in the context of the Scientifical method, nowhere is God discussed, such that at last the author presupposes the arrangement of this discipline as separate from the others, since it disposes of Buddhism and Hinduism, [[Om]] <ref>'''Om''' is a '''sacred sound, syllable, mantra, and an invocation in Hinduism'''. It is regarded as the '''sacred sound of the universe''', representing the ultimate reality that unifies everything in the universe. Chanting Om is a purifying experience and it symbolizes spiritual awakening and the Universe as a whole.</ref>, a non-covered religion of the bunch, as it is directly tied to Linguistics—and furthermore Physics, as this beginning passage tries to proof. | |||
== Notes and References == | == Notes and References == |
Revision as of 11:43, 20 February 2025
From Zeus, the free X encyclopedia
Zeus is a free-content online encyclopedia, built using MediaWiki. Established in 2020 by Eduard da Silva, Zeus serves as a premier reference work on Artificial Intelligence [1] [2] that explores infrastructure and technical communication through open collaboration. Setting outstanding goals to create an engine capable of reasoning, this Encyclopedia dives deep into core components of algorithms and language.
Zeus follows certain fundamental principles that shape its structure and purpose. They ensure that the information presented remains coherent, rigorous, and aligned with the broader vision of the system.
Guiding Principles
- MediaWiki terms.
- Our code of ethics [3]
- Root of Zeus.
The work originated from the goals, approach and principles is based on the disciplines segment of the research, it conveys a knowledge regression tool, the extelligence [4], marking the study of language to its original source, through the symbology X—seen below the title. This research identifies how thought externalization, through symbols and behaviors, is currently limited by the absence of an integrated system. In its current state of meaning [5], the figment of the mind has within a common rule: Creation is an inherent part of how the universe unfolds before us.
Most of disciplines presented in this research serve as communication tools [6] [7]. Regarding the idiom used, and the intricate dialect presented, the lander page (previously referred to as the Notion page) serves as a simplified version of the content here put. Additionally, certain information remains withheld by da Silva due to its closed-source nature, including topics related to the mission and specific toolkit:items. For a deeper understanding of this approach, users may wish to explore Asimov, the parent organization of Zeus, which is recommended for further context (link) on the endeavors of this company.
Disciplines
— We are Limitless, We are Sons of Gods.
Language, Cognition, and Symbolic Evolution
Language is fundamental to human evolution as a whole. Before the pre-modern era, it functioned as a complex form of biological interaction. As explored in the Vocals segment, the nature of creation is examined [8] [9] through the emergence of language among early men and its parallel development of symbolism [10]. Non-physical entities [11] are argued to have emerged as complementary aspects of the environment, as human evolution was primarily driven by the development of the mind rather than the brain [12] [13]. This suggests that as sapiens shape their societies, a tandem evolution occurs between symbolic cognition and religious practices [14] [15], whereas its counterpart—neural mutation patterns [16] and intelligence are responsible of driving mechanical capabilities associated with the evolution of the lobes [17].
The mere formulation of a problem is far more essential than its solution, which may be merely a matter of mathematical or experimental skills. To raise new questions, new possibilities, to regard old problems from a new angle requires creative imagination (...) [18]
Creativity [19] [20] is a curious phenomenon; the same mind that formulates ideas is also susceptible to the bias of experiencing them. While the scientific method provides a structured approach to mitigating this bias, earlier civilizations lacked such a framework, making it difficult to distinguish objective reality from perception. As societies evolved, this struggle extended beyond knowledge itself, shaping the very political and ideological structures that govern progress.
Politics
In the modern era, the process of discovery has stagnated, as humanity has entered a critical state of complexity [21]. The technological systems that underpin society have grown so advanced that the act of developing knowledge and the act of executing it have diverged entirely. Progress, once measured by new insights, is now dictated by the ability to navigate pre-existing systems rather than creating new paradigms. The ideological dominance of Atheism dissolved trough the Ocidental culture [22], framed as the propagation of progress, has inadvertently shaped a culture of intellectual pride, where the ego is overwhelmed by the power of a new form of "Creationism"—that of the mind.
While further developed in the Signe segment, is important to note how sanity is a widely recognized and important subject of Psychology [23]. Paired with aforementioned political affairs of men, there is little room to discuss the supernatural without generally resorting to arguments of hallucinatory experience [24] [25]. As a tenet point of Zeus, that prior to the dawn of the Roman Empire [26], language was primarily a tool for articulating the animistic nature of matter [27] [28]. This is directly tied to the description of miracles, magic, and the formation of Canon Law—not as a spiritual doctrine alone, but as a structural necessity for maintaining reality. Similarly, hallucinations, rather than being understood as psychological phenomena, were perceived as the primary propagation mechanism of supernatural energy [29].
- If Archetypes are the universal cognitive structures that shape the collective unconscious, guiding human perception and behavior, then Alchetypes are their externalized counterparts, where animosity and extelligence operate through the same environment.
The scientific academia, the business enterprise, and the self-pride that accompanies success—attributed to both sources of advancement—are reflections of the behavioral structures of the Acropolis. The power vested in authorities, along with the demonstrations of mastery perpetuated by global media, reveals a pattern: despite vast political and cultural differences, humanity remains driven by the need for proof of reproduction—be it biological, intellectual, or structural.
But why is this so? How can we redefine individual space, progression, and execution in a way that respects the individualism shaped by the modern era? And more importantly, why are Alchetypes integral to this engine?
Our goals
When societies become stagnant, they inevitably drift toward chaos [30], leading to war—whether direct or indirect—conquest is intrinsic to human nature. The very argument that sustains an everlasting process of discovery is the same that upholds zeitgeist [31]: if governments seek to instill an ideal of such magnitude [32], they must possess the intelligence to navigate cultural and technological trends effectively, in its scope, to develop nature-inspired design. However, it is hard to define nature on itself [33] [34].
This is Zeus—a system that supports Lux, by allowing the comprehension Nature as a living entity, and thus offering ways to surpass the ill-based network of globalization the 21st century has been experiencing, while remaining akin to the modern man. See Avatar, The Hub and XR for further insights.
- This methodology is based on Thread & Tradition [35].
- It relies on the logic that digital worlds will be the best way to overcome overpopulation, poverty, psychological warfare, and many other stagnant issues of the current era by relying on free space [36] as means to expand our societal areas of contact.
Notably, so far as religion is introduced in the context of the Scientifical method, nowhere is God discussed, such that at last the author presupposes the arrangement of this discipline as separate from the others, since it disposes of Buddhism and Hinduism, Om [37], a non-covered religion of the bunch, as it is directly tied to Linguistics—and furthermore Physics, as this beginning passage tries to proof.
Notes and References
- ↑ AI and Philosophy: Exploring the Complex Relationship between Worldviews and Technology Development for an Inclusive and Ethical Future. SSRN. December 6, 2023. Retrieved on February 5, 2025.
- ↑ Is Philosophy the Next LLM Training Frontier?. MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. December 3, 2024. Retrieved in February 5, 2025
- ↑ Also see Copyrights.
- ↑ Stewart, I., & Cohen, J. (1997). Figments of reality: The evolution of the curious mind. Cambridge University Press.
- ↑ Jack Cohen used extelligence to describe knowledge external to the mind—stored in culture, language, and technology—enabling rapid societal evolution beyond biological limits.
- ↑ 3rd → 6th and 9th. These topics are, in sum, available for machines to create a basal language layer, after establishing an operating theory of mind. Furthermore, the enumeration represents the applicable disciplines from the available table of contents, seen below trough the title ´Disciplines´.
- ↑ Rather than epistemological and historical (or in the case of number 7, algorithmic) source
- ↑ A chicken-and-egg problem is shown to exist between the emergence of symbolic thought and language: language is said to be the medium of symbolic thought, but it is reasoned that mastery of language would first require the ability to think symbolically. The solution of this chicken-and-egg problem, according to Deacon, is the subtle evolutionary process of co-evolution. The Symbolic Species. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
- ↑ Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. W.W. Norton & Company.
- ↑ Bednarik, R. G. (2014). The origins of symboling. Signs - International Journal of Semiotics, 8, 1–29.
- ↑ As of today, miracles constitute a significant aspect of what the canon law of the Catholic Church recognizes as holy. While Zeus remains religiously neutral and does not objectify any particular faith, Catholicism is used in this example due to its potential familiarity to the reader. However, any sufficiently complex religious sanctuary with a similar structure should be equally recognizable as a representation of such an entity.
- ↑ Bednarik, R. G. (2023). The emergence of mind: A dualistic understanding. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 44(2), 123–145.
- ↑ Moreira-Almeida, A., & Araujo, S. F. (2018). The presentation of the mind-brain problem in leading psychiatry journals. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 40(3), 335–342.
- ↑ Without any causal relation whatsoever, all ancient civilizations had as a core functioning structure of villages, a spiritual temple. See Ziggurat for an example of kind of enigmatic structure where the ancient religious practice took place, furtherly developed on the pyramid's proof [ref].
- ↑ Chilton, P., & Kopytowska, M. (2018). Introduction: Religion as a cognitive and linguistic phenomenon. In P. Chilton & M. Kopytowska (Eds.), Religion, language, and the human mind (pp. xvii–lii). Oxford University Press.
- ↑ Vallender, E. J., Mekel-Bobrov, N., & Lahn, B. T. (2008). Genetic basis of human brain evolution. Trends in Neurosciences, 31(12), 637–644.
- ↑ However, mental states remain an abstract concept within this emerging science—one that is extensively explored through Analytics, keen to the wiki, and integral to what this excerpt seeks to demonstrate to neuroscience.
- ↑ Albert Einstein
- ↑ van den Berk, T. (2012). Jung on art: The autonomy of the creative drive. Taylor & Francis Group.
- ↑ Jung saw creativity as an autonomous function of the psyche. This means that for him, creativity was not merely a conscious effort but a spontaneous process arising from the depths of the unconscious. He believed that our unconscious is a powerful source of creativity, which is further driven and seeded in the collective unconscious—a vast reservoir of shared human experiences and archetypes. This creative force operates independently, manifesting in dreams, fantasies, and spontaneous artistic expressions. Pekonen, Y. (2024, July 15). Jung on creativity. IABET.
- ↑ To Science, the dominance of reductionism has driven progress since the Scientific Revolution. However, this approach has fostered a siloed structure, where fields operate independently. This lack of interconnectedness hinders our ability to address complex, interdisciplinary challenges. Fragmentation obstructs solutions to new scientifical breaktrough , which demand collaboration across disciplines. It also constrains our understanding of reality, as gaps persist between domains such as physics and neuroscience. Mechanistic worldviews, focused on isolated phenomena, fail to account for emergent properties.
- ↑ Atheism, once a fringe position, has become a dominant intellectual force in Western culture, largely due to scientific advancements, philosophical materialism, and secular governance. From Greek rationalism to the Enlightenment and modern secular humanism, the West has systematically challenged religious authority, promoting reason, empiricism, and individual autonomy over faith-based worldviews.
- ↑ Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2006). Intelligence testing with divergent thinking tasks: A double-edged sword. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40(1), 1–3.
- ↑ Larøi, F., Luhrmann, T. M., Bell, V., Christian, W. A., Deshpande, S., Fernyhough, C., Jenkins, J., & Woods, A. (2014). Culture and hallucinations: Overview and future directions. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40(Suppl 4), S213–S220. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbu012
- ↑ Pechey, R., & Halligan, P. (2011). The prevalence of delusion-like beliefs relative to sociocultural beliefs in the general population. Psychopathology, 44(2), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1159/000319788
- ↑ Albeit a complex topic on its own, it is to note that the prophecy of Jesus, and its close tie to the Roman Empire is related as a major shift in societal behavior, as the Anno Domini marked the beginning of a new world. This is fourthly developed in The man and the empire, however, and notably, a deep and intricate subject of this research. Even so, the argument can be discarded for sake of congruency, as the pre-modern man in general would be liable of such effect, and therefore that it is a delicacy of the structure of the research that the Middle Ages are not affected by such argument.
- ↑ Conceptual Foundations: Jungian Psychology: The anima represents the unconscious projection of life onto external objects. Animism: Indigenous traditions view all things—living and non-living—as possessing a spirit or consciousness, shaping early worldviews. Mysticism (Mistic): The author expands animism by incorporating esoteric and supernatural forces, suggesting that matter serves as a bridge between the physical and metaphysical realms.
- ↑ One good example of such, is the Aegis. Generally, anima is described by the yielding of tools forged by the Gods, that possess powers beyond common matter.
- ↑ While on the topic of energy, this encyclopedia aims to broaden the connection between Relativistic Mechanics and human cognition. Special Relativity redefined energy by establishing its intrinsic link to mass and spacetime, demonstrating that energy is not an independent force, but a property governed by physical laws, which may also have implications for understanding perception, consciousness, and the structure of thought. They are developed on The Boltzmann Brain Argument, however it is to note that special relativity states that the laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion and that time and space are not absolute but interconnected as "spacetime." It also demonstrates that the speed of light is constant for all observers. This is inconsistent, however, with the aforementioned societal shift. It is important to address the dilation of knowledge over time not as a mere physical process, but rather as an integrated system where condensed space, i.e., matter, refers not only to gravitational lensing but also to the encoding quality of physical laws as their animosity state change over spacetime. A great argument for this excerpt can be found on Dark Matter & Energy topic.
- ↑ ref
- ↑ lorem
- ↑ That of Atheism, and Occidentalism.
- ↑ lorem
- ↑ external ref
- ↑ lorem
- ↑ Free space refers to areas used by society that categorize on leisure or otherwise, non-categorized at all. They oftentimes are limited by, if not exclusive to transit, sitting, or serve as infrastructure for trivial objects (discarding pottery or yards, that are too categorized as such but non-trivial).
- ↑ Om is a sacred sound, syllable, mantra, and an invocation in Hinduism. It is regarded as the sacred sound of the universe, representing the ultimate reality that unifies everything in the universe. Chanting Om is a purifying experience and it symbolizes spiritual awakening and the Universe as a whole.