Jump to content

Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Zeus
Created page with "By Chat GPT 4.0 mini: Your argument on '''language and religion''' is thought-provoking and aligns with theories that see language as more than just a communicative tool—it’s a structuring force in human cognition, society, and even metaphysical thought. However, there are a few aspects that could be '''strengthened or clarified''': === Strengths of Your Argument === # '''Parallels Established Between Language and Religion''' #* You argue that '''language and reli..."
Tag: 2017 source edit
 
New foundation was laid out.
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 1: Line 1:
By Chat GPT 4.0 mini:
Da Silva believes that the main preoccupations of the results of Zeus stem on one political affair and two technological ones
 
# How to empower undeveloped nations righteously without resorting to 'racial equality' laws to equalize the damage done by white men in times of slavery?
Your argument on '''language and religion''' is thought-provoking and aligns with theories that see language as more than just a communicative tool—it’s a structuring force in human cognition, society, and even metaphysical thought. However, there are a few aspects that could be '''strengthened or clarified''':
# How to distribute cheaper energy and AR/VR equipment to inhospitable places?
 
# How to create friendly ecosystems that enhance people's work possibilites with the available toolkits?
=== Strengths of Your Argument ===
 
# '''Parallels Established Between Language and Religion'''
#* You argue that '''language and religion emerged together'''—this aligns with theories that see religion as a system of meaning, heavily dependent on linguistic structures.
#* The claim that '''non-physical entities exist as a complementary study''' suggests that belief systems arose as an early structuring method for abstract thinking.
# '''Evolutionary Framing'''
#* The idea that '''language is a complex biological interaction''' before the pre-modern era is '''biologically sound''' and in line with theories like '''Terrence Deacon's''' on the co-evolution of language and symbolic thought.
#* You emphasize '''mental evolution over brain evolution''', which is an important distinction. It suggests that language didn't just result from biological mutations but from the '''self-reinforcing expansion of cognitive and social structures'''.
 
=== Areas That Need Refinement ===
 
# '''Causality & Mutual Influence'''
#* You state that ''"the key structuring point for the reason non-physical entities are present"'' is linked to language and religion.
#* '''Possible refinement:''' Instead of implying a one-way causality, you could '''clarify the feedback loop'''—did language allow for the conception of gods, or did religious structures refine linguistic complexity?
# '''Philosophical & Anthropological Support'''
#* This argument is bold and could be strengthened by referencing:
#** '''Durkheim''' (Religion as a social construct that gives shared meaning).
#** '''Chomsky''' (Language as an innate faculty, evolving alongside structured belief).
#** '''Deacon''' (The symbolic niche—how humans adapted to meaning-making).
# '''Transition Between Language & Intelligence'''
#* You link language to the '''non-physical''', but the bridge to '''intelligence development''' is implied rather than explicitly made.
#* If Zeus aims to define '''extelligence''', perhaps it could be positioned as the next phase in this evolution:
#** '''Language → Religion → Structured Intelligence'''
 
=== Possible Rewrite for Clarity ===
''"Language is fundamental to this discipline and to human evolution as a whole. Before the pre-modern era, it functioned as a complex form of biological interaction, explored in the Vocals segment. A central argument for the emergence of language among early men is its parallel development alongside religion [ref], where the need for structured belief led to an expansion in symbolic cognition. This made the non-physical an integral element of human intelligence, reinforcing the evolution of mental constructs over mere neural adaptations [ref] [ref]."''

Revision as of 23:42, 11 March 2025

Da Silva believes that the main preoccupations of the results of Zeus stem on one political affair and two technological ones

  1. How to empower undeveloped nations righteously without resorting to 'racial equality' laws to equalize the damage done by white men in times of slavery?
  2. How to distribute cheaper energy and AR/VR equipment to inhospitable places?
  3. How to create friendly ecosystems that enhance people's work possibilites with the available toolkits?