|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| By Chat GPT 4.0 mini:
| | Da Silva believes that the main preoccupations of the results of Zeus stem on one political affair and two technological ones |
| | | # How to empower undeveloped nations righteously without resorting to 'racial equality' laws to equalize the damage done by white men in times of slavery? |
| Your argument on '''language and religion''' is thought-provoking and aligns with theories that see language as more than just a communicative tool—it’s a structuring force in human cognition, society, and even metaphysical thought. However, there are a few aspects that could be '''strengthened or clarified''':
| | # How to distribute cheaper energy and AR/VR equipment to inhospitable places? |
| | | # How to create friendly ecosystems that enhance people's work possibilites with the available toolkits? |
| === Strengths of Your Argument ===
| |
| | |
| # '''Parallels Established Between Language and Religion'''
| |
| #* You argue that '''language and religion emerged together'''—this aligns with theories that see religion as a system of meaning, heavily dependent on linguistic structures.
| |
| #* The claim that '''non-physical entities exist as a complementary study''' suggests that belief systems arose as an early structuring method for abstract thinking.
| |
| # '''Evolutionary Framing'''
| |
| #* The idea that '''language is a complex biological interaction''' before the pre-modern era is '''biologically sound''' and in line with theories like '''Terrence Deacon's''' on the co-evolution of language and symbolic thought.
| |
| #* You emphasize '''mental evolution over brain evolution''', which is an important distinction. It suggests that language didn't just result from biological mutations but from the '''self-reinforcing expansion of cognitive and social structures'''.
| |
| | |
| === Areas That Need Refinement ===
| |
| | |
| # '''Causality & Mutual Influence''' | |
| #* You state that ''"the key structuring point for the reason non-physical entities are present"'' is linked to language and religion.
| |
| #* '''Possible refinement:''' Instead of implying a one-way causality, you could '''clarify the feedback loop'''—did language allow for the conception of gods, or did religious structures refine linguistic complexity?
| |
| # '''Philosophical & Anthropological Support''' | |
| #* This argument is bold and could be strengthened by referencing:
| |
| #** '''Durkheim''' (Religion as a social construct that gives shared meaning).
| |
| #** '''Chomsky''' (Language as an innate faculty, evolving alongside structured belief).
| |
| #** '''Deacon''' (The symbolic niche—how humans adapted to meaning-making).
| |
| # '''Transition Between Language & Intelligence''' | |
| #* You link language to the '''non-physical''', but the bridge to '''intelligence development''' is implied rather than explicitly made.
| |
| #* If Zeus aims to define '''extelligence''', perhaps it could be positioned as the next phase in this evolution:
| |
| #** '''Language → Religion → Structured Intelligence'''
| |
| | |
| === Possible Rewrite for Clarity ===
| |
| ''"Language is fundamental to this discipline and to human evolution as a whole. Before the pre-modern era, it functioned as a complex form of biological interaction, explored in the Vocals segment. A central argument for the emergence of language among early men is its parallel development alongside religion [ref], where the need for structured belief led to an expansion in symbolic cognition. This made the non-physical an integral element of human intelligence, reinforcing the evolution of mental constructs over mere neural adaptations [ref] [ref]."''
| |
Da Silva believes that the main preoccupations of the results of Zeus stem on one political affair and two technological ones
- How to empower undeveloped nations righteously without resorting to 'racial equality' laws to equalize the damage done by white men in times of slavery?
- How to distribute cheaper energy and AR/VR equipment to inhospitable places?
- How to create friendly ecosystems that enhance people's work possibilites with the available toolkits?