Main Page: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:48, 5 March 2025

From Zeus, the free AGX encyclopedia

Zeus is a free-content online encyclopedia, built using MediaWiki. Established in 2020 by Eduard da Silva, It serves as a premier reference work on Artificial Intelligence ^[1] ^[2] that explores infrastructure and technical communication through open collaboration. Setting outstanding goals to create an engine capable of reasoning, this Encyclopedia dives deep into core components of algorithms and language.

Zeus follows certain fundamental principles that shape its structure and purpose.

Guiding Principles

Most of disciplines presented in this research serve as communication tools ^[4] ^[5]. Regarding the idiom used, and the intricate dialect presented, the lander page (previously referred to as the Notion page) serves as a simplified version of the content. Additionally, certain information remains withheld by da Silva due to its closed-source nature, including topics related to the mission and specific toolkit:items. For a deeper understanding of this approach, users may wish to explore Asimov, the parent organization of Zeus, which is recommended for further context on the endeavors of this company.

The work originated from the goals, approach and principles is based on the disciplines segment of the research, it conveys a knowledge regression tool, the extelligence ^[6], marking the study of language to its original source, through the symbology AGX—seen below the title. This research identifies how thought externalization, through symbols and behaviors, is currently limited by the absence of an integrated system. In its current state of meaning ^[7], the figment of the mind has within a common rule: Creation is an inherent part of how the universe unfolds before us.

Disciplines

— We are Limitless, We are Sons of Gods.

Zeus
Vocals
Bases
Generators
Degradators
Identificators
Signa
Signe
Toolkits

Language, Cognition, and Symbolic Evolution

Language is fundamental to human evolution as a whole. Before the pre-modern era, it functioned as a complex form of biological interaction. As explored in the Vocals segment, the nature of creation is examined ^[8] ^[9] through the emergence of language among early men and its parallel development of symbolism ^[10]. Non-physical entities ^[11] are argued to have emerged as complementary aspects of the environment, as human evolution was primarily driven by the development of the mind rather than the brain ^[12] ^[13] ^[14]. This suggests that as sapiens shape their societies, a tandem evolution occurs between symbolic cognition and religious practices ^[15] ^[16], whereas its counterpart—neural mutation ^[17] and intelligence, responsible of driving mechanical capabilities associated with the evolution of the lobes ^[18] do not accomplish the task of nurturing, but rather of logic.

The mere formulation of a problem is far more essential than its solution, which may be merely a matter of mathematical or experimental skills. To raise new questions, new possibilities, to regard old problems from a new angle requires creative imagination (...) ^[19]

Creativity ^[20] ^[21] is a curious phenomenon; it seems strange to affirm there must be a task at relay as if technology since the creation of the stone tool was conveyed by logical development of the lobes. This is closely tied to Gödel's incompleteness theorems as an axiom of any sort relies on the extrapolation of an initial point where some formal system exerts mathematical weigh to an argument, of which seems to be untrue, as there is no initial point but rather an emergence of qualities. Perhaps what Gödel was aiming to comprehend by disproving of possible ways to determine truth of natural sets, and therefore questioning its consistency, is that to develop any form of language there must be an incoherency bias to numbers and living beings, that relies on a task of polar paradoxical states by which our own scientifical systems fails in nurturing.

If Archetypes are the universal cognitive structures that shape the collective unconscious, guiding human perception and behavior, then Alchetypes are their externalized counterparts, where extelligence and the spirit's will operate, that describe a more suitable approach to the incompleteness theorems.

Lorem

Ipsum

This research

However external, the scientific academia, the business enterprise, and the self-pride that accompanies success are reflections of the behavioral structures of the Acropolis. The power vested in authorities, along with the demonstrations of mastery perpetuated by global media, reveals a pattern: despite vast political and cultural differences, humanity remains driven by the need for proof of reproduction—be it biological, intellectual, or structural.

But why is this so? How can we redefine individual space, progression, and execution in a way that respects the individualism shaped by the modern era? And more importantly, why are Alchetypes integral to this engine?

Our goals

When societies become stagnant, they inevitably drift toward chaos, leading to war—whether direct or indirect—conquest is intrinsic to human nature. The very argument that sustains an everlasting process of discovery is the same that upholds zeitgeist ^[22]: if governments seek to instill an ideal of such magnitude ^[23], they must possess the intelligence to navigate cultural and technological trends effectively, in its scope, and to develop nature-inspired design. However, it is hard to define nature on itself ^[24], and even so what to build from it in a world built on metal and plastics.

This is Zeus—a system that supports Lux, by allowing the comprehension of Nature as a living entity and thus offering ways to surpass the ill-based network of globalization the 21^st century has been experiencing, while remaining akin to the modern man. See Avatar, The Hub, XR and LVLUP toolkits for further insights.

This methodology is based on Thread & Tradition ^[25] ^[26].
It relies on the prediction that digital worlds will be the way to overcome overpopulation, poverty, psychological warfare, and other lingering issues of the current era, by relying on free space ^[27] as means to expand our societal areas of contact ^[28] ^[29].

At last, and notably, so far as religion is introduced in the context of the Scientifical method, nowhere is the meaning of God discussed, such that the author presupposes the arrangement of this topic as separate from the others, since it disposes of Om ^[30], a special type ^[31] of Religious method, as it is directly tied to true Linguistics—and furthermore Physics, as this introduction displays.

Notes and References

↑ AI and Philosophy: Exploring the Complex Relationship between Worldviews and Technology Development for an Inclusive and Ethical Future. SSRN. December 6, 2023. Retrieved on February 5, 2025.
↑ Is Philosophy the Next LLM Training Frontier?. MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. December 3, 2024. Retrieved in February 5, 2025
↑ Also see Copyrights.
↑ 3^rd → 6^th and 9^th. These topics are, in sum, available for machines to create a basal language layer, after establishing an operating theory of mind. Furthermore, the enumeration represents the applicable disciplines from the available table of contents, seen below trough the title ´Disciplines´.
↑ Rather than epistemological and historical (or in the case of number 7, algorithmic) source
↑ Stewart, I., & Cohen, J. (1997). Figments of reality: The evolution of the curious mind. Cambridge University Press.
↑ Jack Cohen used extelligence to describe knowledge external to the mind—stored in culture, language, and technology—enabling rapid societal evolution beyond biological limits.
↑ A chicken-and-egg problem is shown to exist between the emergence of symbolic thought and language: language is said to be the medium of symbolic thought, but it is reasoned that mastery of language would first require the ability to think symbolically. The solution of this chicken-and-egg problem, according to Deacon, is the subtle evolutionary process of co-evolution. The Symbolic Species. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
↑ Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. W.W. Norton & Company.
↑ Bednarik, R. G. (2014). The origins of symboling. Signs - International Journal of Semiotics, 8, 1–29.
↑ As of today, miracles constitute a significant aspect of what the canon law of the Catholic Church recognizes as holy. While Zeus remains religiously neutral and does not objectify any particular faith, Catholicism is used in this example due to its potential familiarity to the reader. However, any sufficiently complex religious sanctuary with a similar structure should be equally recognizable as a representation of such an entity.
↑ Bednarik, R. G. (2023). The emergence of mind: A dualistic understanding. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 44(2), 123–145.
↑ Moreira-Almeida, A., & Araujo, S. F. (2018). The presentation of the mind-brain problem in leading psychiatry journals. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 40(3), 335–342.
↑ Add proof of the hollow brain guy
↑ Without any causal relation whatsoever, all ancient civilizations had as a core functioning structure of villages, a spiritual temple. See Ziggurat for an example of kind of enigmatic structure where the ancient religious practice took place, furtherly developed on the pyramid's proof [ref].
↑ Chilton, P., & Kopytowska, M. (2018). Introduction: Religion as a cognitive and linguistic phenomenon. In P. Chilton & M. Kopytowska (Eds.), Religion, language, and the human mind (pp. xvii–lii). Oxford University Press.
↑ Vallender, E. J., Mekel-Bobrov, N., & Lahn, B. T. (2008). Genetic basis of human brain evolution. Trends in Neurosciences, 31(12), 637–644.
↑ However, mental states remain an abstract concept within this emerging science—one that is extensively explored through Analytics, keen to the wiki, and integral to what this excerpt seeks to demonstrate to neuroscience.
↑ Albert Einstein
↑ van den Berk, T. (2012). Jung on art: The autonomy of the creative drive. Taylor & Francis Group.
↑ Carl Jung saw creativity as an autonomous function of the psyche. This means that for him, creativity was not merely a conscious effort but a spontaneous process arising from the depths of the unconscious. He believed that our unconscious is a powerful source of creativity, which is further driven and seeded in the collective unconscious—a vast reservoir of shared human experiences and archetypes. This creative force operates independently, manifesting in dreams, fantasies, and spontaneous artistic expressions. Pekonen, Y. (2024, July 15). Jung on creativity. IABET.
↑ Defining the spirit of an era is an arduous task, as it emerges through the uphill trajectory of its development, often in opposition to a particular class of objects of appreciation. However, the defining challenge of the modern world, shaped by globalization, is that the power of knowledge itself dulls the process of discovery, leading to meta-conflicts—battles not over the objects of appreciation, but over knowledge as an end in itself. The psychological warfare born from the emergence of duality and paradox disorients the mind, forcing individuals to reconcile conflicting perspectives. It is no coincidence that spirituality has declined, as civilizations increasingly exposed to the ever-seeing eye of the internet become more susceptible to the erosion of introspective and metaphysical pursuits.
↑ That of Atheism, Occidentalism, and furthermore the geographical pivot of history.
↑ Ducarme, F., & Couvet, D. (2020). What does 'nature' mean? Palgrave Communications, 6, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.
↑ The engine is powered by a novelty language system based on the evolution of comprehension of time (i.e., not as in relativity, but rather of ancient wisdom), that runs on threaded code to transfer situation comprehensive information, as well as a theory of mind. They must be complex and demanding tasks, not suitable for computers to run, if not otherwise processed by the compiler presented by this engine.
↑ Furthermore, Alchetypes must be a way to extract the theory of mind from the environment and dynamically extrapolate their Archetypes into a comprehensible, marketable, insightful and playful manner.
↑ Free space refers to areas used by society that categorize on leisure, or otherwise, non-categorized at all. They oftentimes are limited by, if not exclusive to transit, resting, or serve as infrastructure for trivial objects and nature. Generally, can be described as lacking consistent qualities of life.
↑ Lee, L.-H., Braud, T., Zhou, P., Wang, L., Xu, D., Lin, Z., Kumar, A., Bermejo, C., & Hui, P. (2021). The Metaverse: Survey, trends, novel pipeline ecosystem & future directions. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 51(11), 4854–4875. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2021.3053212
↑ Jauhiainen, J. S. (2024). The Metaverse: Innovations and generative AI. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 8(3), 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2024.04.004
↑ Om is a sacred sound, syllable, mantra, and an invocation in Hinduism. It is regarded as the sacred sound of the universe, representing the ultimate reality that unifies everything in the universe. Chanting Om is a purifying experience and it symbolizes spiritual awakening and the Universe as a whole.
↑ Regarding to this statement, the author notes that all religions portray some form of animism, and the language of God. However, Om is reinforced as sacred to Zeus because it stems from the systematization of the elements of logic of this research, and of the doctrine created to structure them.

[1] AI and Philosophy: Exploring the Complex Relationship between Worldviews and Technology Development for an Inclusive and Ethical Future. SSRN. December 6, 2023. Retrieved on February 5, 2025.

[2] Is Philosophy the Next LLM Training Frontier?. MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. December 3, 2024. Retrieved in February 5, 2025

[3] Also see Copyrights.

[4] 3^rd → 6^th and 9^th. These topics are, in sum, available for machines to create a basal language layer, after establishing an operating theory of mind. Furthermore, the enumeration represents the applicable disciplines from the available table of contents, seen below trough the title ´Disciplines´.

[5] Rather than epistemological and historical (or in the case of number 7, algorithmic) source

[6] Stewart, I., & Cohen, J. (1997). Figments of reality: The evolution of the curious mind. Cambridge University Press.

[7] Jack Cohen used extelligence to describe knowledge external to the mind—stored in culture, language, and technology—enabling rapid societal evolution beyond biological limits.

[8] A chicken-and-egg problem is shown to exist between the emergence of symbolic thought and language: language is said to be the medium of symbolic thought, but it is reasoned that mastery of language would first require the ability to think symbolically. The solution of this chicken-and-egg problem, according to Deacon, is the subtle evolutionary process of co-evolution. The Symbolic Species. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.

[9] Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. W.W. Norton & Company.

[10] Bednarik, R. G. (2014). The origins of symboling. Signs - International Journal of Semiotics, 8, 1–29.

[11] As of today, miracles constitute a significant aspect of what the canon law of the Catholic Church recognizes as holy. While Zeus remains religiously neutral and does not objectify any particular faith, Catholicism is used in this example due to its potential familiarity to the reader. However, any sufficiently complex religious sanctuary with a similar structure should be equally recognizable as a representation of such an entity.

[12] Bednarik, R. G. (2023). The emergence of mind: A dualistic understanding. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 44(2), 123–145.

[13] Moreira-Almeida, A., & Araujo, S. F. (2018). The presentation of the mind-brain problem in leading psychiatry journals. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 40(3), 335–342.

[14] Add proof of the hollow brain guy

[15] Without any causal relation whatsoever, all ancient civilizations had as a core functioning structure of villages, a spiritual temple. See Ziggurat for an example of kind of enigmatic structure where the ancient religious practice took place, furtherly developed on the pyramid's proof [ref].

[16] Chilton, P., & Kopytowska, M. (2018). Introduction: Religion as a cognitive and linguistic phenomenon. In P. Chilton & M. Kopytowska (Eds.), Religion, language, and the human mind (pp. xvii–lii). Oxford University Press.

[17] Vallender, E. J., Mekel-Bobrov, N., & Lahn, B. T. (2008). Genetic basis of human brain evolution. Trends in Neurosciences, 31(12), 637–644.

[18] However, mental states remain an abstract concept within this emerging science—one that is extensively explored through Analytics, keen to the wiki, and integral to what this excerpt seeks to demonstrate to neuroscience.

[19] Albert Einstein

[20] van den Berk, T. (2012). Jung on art: The autonomy of the creative drive. Taylor & Francis Group.

[21] Carl Jung saw creativity as an autonomous function of the psyche. This means that for him, creativity was not merely a conscious effort but a spontaneous process arising from the depths of the unconscious. He believed that our unconscious is a powerful source of creativity, which is further driven and seeded in the collective unconscious—a vast reservoir of shared human experiences and archetypes. This creative force operates independently, manifesting in dreams, fantasies, and spontaneous artistic expressions. Pekonen, Y. (2024, July 15). Jung on creativity. IABET.

[22] Defining the spirit of an era is an arduous task, as it emerges through the uphill trajectory of its development, often in opposition to a particular class of objects of appreciation. However, the defining challenge of the modern world, shaped by globalization, is that the power of knowledge itself dulls the process of discovery, leading to meta-conflicts—battles not over the objects of appreciation, but over knowledge as an end in itself. The psychological warfare born from the emergence of duality and paradox disorients the mind, forcing individuals to reconcile conflicting perspectives. It is no coincidence that spirituality has declined, as civilizations increasingly exposed to the ever-seeing eye of the internet become more susceptible to the erosion of introspective and metaphysical pursuits.

[23] That of Atheism, Occidentalism, and furthermore the geographical pivot of history.

[24] Ducarme, F., & Couvet, D. (2020). What does 'nature' mean? Palgrave Communications, 6, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.

[25] The engine is powered by a novelty language system based on the evolution of comprehension of time (i.e., not as in relativity, but rather of ancient wisdom), that runs on threaded code to transfer situation comprehensive information, as well as a theory of mind. They must be complex and demanding tasks, not suitable for computers to run, if not otherwise processed by the compiler presented by this engine.

[26] Furthermore, Alchetypes must be a way to extract the theory of mind from the environment and dynamically extrapolate their Archetypes into a comprehensible, marketable, insightful and playful manner.

[27] Free space refers to areas used by society that categorize on leisure, or otherwise, non-categorized at all. They oftentimes are limited by, if not exclusive to transit, resting, or serve as infrastructure for trivial objects and nature. Generally, can be described as lacking consistent qualities of life.

[28] Lee, L.-H., Braud, T., Zhou, P., Wang, L., Xu, D., Lin, Z., Kumar, A., Bermejo, C., & Hui, P. (2021). The Metaverse: Survey, trends, novel pipeline ecosystem & future directions. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 51(11), 4854–4875. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2021.3053212

[29] Jauhiainen, J. S. (2024). The Metaverse: Innovations and generative AI. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 8(3), 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2024.04.004

[30] Om is a sacred sound, syllable, mantra, and an invocation in Hinduism. It is regarded as the sacred sound of the universe, representing the ultimate reality that unifies everything in the universe. Chanting Om is a purifying experience and it symbolizes spiritual awakening and the Universe as a whole.

[31] Regarding to this statement, the author notes that all religions portray some form of animism, and the language of God. However, Om is reinforced as sacred to Zeus because it stems from the systematization of the elements of logic of this research, and of the doctrine created to structure them.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 * Our [[code of ethics]] <ref>Also see [[Copyrights]].</ref>.
 * [[History of Zeus|Root]] of Zeus.
+Most of '''disciplines''' presented in this research serve as communication tools <ref>'''3<sup>rd</sup> → 6<sup>th</sup> and 9<sup>th</sup>'''. These topics are, in sum, available for machines to create a basal language layer, after establishing an operating [[wikipedia:Theory_of_mind|theory of mind]]. Furthermore, the enumeration represents the applicable '''disciplines''' from the available '''table of contents''', seen below trough the title ´'''Disciplines'''´.</ref> <ref>Rather than epistemological and historical (or in the case of number 7, algorithmic) source</ref>. Regarding the idiom used, and the intricate dialect presented, the lander [https://roters.notion.site/f33710f705db48b9a8b5897d809d6336?v=14143e71496c47d1a8daea00aba24a63 page] (previously referred to as the Notion page) serves as a simplified version of the content. Additionally, certain information remains withheld by ''da Silva'' due to its closed-source nature, including topics related to the mission and specific [[toolkit:items]]. For a deeper understanding of this approach, users may wish to explore '''''Asimov''''', the parent organization of '''''Zeus''''', which is recommended for further context on the endeavors of this company.
 The work originated from the goals, approach and principles is based on the disciplines segment of the research, it conveys a knowledge '''regression''' '''tool''', the [[extelligence]] <ref>Stewart, I., & Cohen, J. (1997). ''Figments of reality: The evolution of the curious mind.'' Cambridge University Press.</ref>, marking the study of language to its original source, through the symbology ''AGX—''seen below the title. This research identifies how thought externalization, through symbols and behaviors, is currently '''limited by the absence of an integrated''' [[wikipedia:System|system]]. In its ''current state of meaning'' <ref>Jack Cohen used '''extelligence''' to describe knowledge external to the mind—stored in culture, language, and technology—enabling rapid societal evolution beyond biological limits.</ref>, the figment of the mind has within a common rule: '''Creation''' is an inherent part of how the universe unfolds before us.
-Most of '''disciplines''' presented in this research serve as communication tools <ref>'''3<sup>rd</sup> → 6<sup>th</sup> and 9<sup>th</sup>'''. These topics are, in sum, available for machines to create a basal language layer, after establishing an operating [[wikipedia:Theory_of_mind|theory of mind]]. Furthermore, the enumeration represents the applicable '''disciplines''' from the available '''table of contents''', seen below trough the title ´'''Disciplines'''´.</ref> <ref>Rather than epistemological and historical (or in the case of number 7, algorithmic) source</ref>. Regarding the idiom used, and the intricate dialect presented, the lander [https://roters.notion.site/f33710f705db48b9a8b5897d809d6336?v=14143e71496c47d1a8daea00aba24a63 page] (previously referred to as the Notion page) serves as a simplified version of the content. Additionally, certain information remains withheld by ''da Silva'' due to its closed-source nature, including topics related to the mission and specific [[toolkit:items]]. For a deeper understanding of this approach, users may wish to explore '''''Asimov''''', the parent organization of '''''Zeus''''', which is recommended for further context on the endeavors of this company.
 == Disciplines ==
@@ Line 29: / Line 28: @@
 === Language, Cognition, and Symbolic Evolution ===
-Language is fundamental to human evolution as a whole. [[wikipedia:Contemporary_history|Before]] the pre-modern era, it functioned as a complex form of [[wikipedia:Biological_interaction|biological interaction]]. As explored in the [[Vocals]] segment, the '''nature of creation is examined''' <ref>A chicken-and-egg problem is shown to exist between the '''emergence of symbolic thought and language''': language is said to be the medium of symbolic thought, but it is reasoned that mastery of language would first require the ability to think symbolically. The solution of this chicken-and-egg problem, according to Deacon, is the subtle evolutionary process of '''co-evolution'''. ''[[wikipedia:The_Symbolic_Species|The Symbolic Species]].'' Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.</ref> <ref>'''Deacon, T. W. (1997).''' ''The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain.'' W.W. Norton & Company.</ref> through the emergence of language among [[wikipedia:Language#Origin|early men]] and its parallel development of symbolism <ref>'''Bednarik, R. G. (2014).''' [https://www.academia.edu/82235063/The_origins_of_symboling The origins of symboling]. ''Signs - International Journal of Semiotics'', 8, 1–29.</ref>. ''[[wikipedia:Non-physical_entity|Non-physical entities]]'' <ref>As of today, [[wikipedia:Miracle|miracles]] '''constitute a significant aspect''' of what the [[wikipedia:Canon_law_of_the_Catholic_Church|canon law of the Catholic Church]] recognizes as holy. While ''Zeus'' remains religiously neutral and does not objectify any particular faith, Catholicism is used in this example due to its potential familiarity to the reader. However, any '''sufficiently complex''' religious sanctuary with a similar structure should be equally recognizable as a representation of such an entity.</ref> are argued to have emerged as complementary aspects of the environment, as human evolution was primarily driven by the development of the [[wikipedia:Mind|mind]] rather than the brain <ref>'''Bednarik, R. G. (2023).''' [[The emergence of mind: A dualistic understanding]]. ''Journal of Mind and Behavior'', 44(2), 123–145.</ref> <ref>Moreira-Almeida, A., & Araujo, S. F. (2018). [https://www.scielo.br/j/rbp/a/CdVJSYK576TzLXYY8ywmnWL/ The presentation of the mind-brain problem in leading psychiatry journals]. ''Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria'', 40(3), 335–342.</ref>. This suggests that as ''sapiens'' shape their societies, a '''tandem evolution occurs between''' [[wikipedia:Symbol|'''symbolic''']] '''cognition and religious practices''' <ref>Without any causal relation whatsoever, '''all''' '''ancient civilizations''' had as a core functioning structure of villages, a spiritual temple. See [[wikipedia:Ziggurat|Ziggurat]] for an example of kind of enigmatic structure where the ancient religious practice took place, furtherly developed on the pyramid's proof [ref].</ref> <ref>'''Chilton, P., & Kopytowska, M. (2018).''' [https://academic.oup.com/book/12438/chapter-abstract/162053479?redirectedFrom=fulltext Introduction: Religion as a cognitive and linguistic phenomenon]. In P. Chilton & M. Kopytowska (Eds.), ''Religion, language, and the human mind'' (pp. xvii–lii). Oxford University Press.</ref>, whereas its counterpart—neural mutation patterns <ref>'''Vallender, E. J., Mekel-Bobrov, N., & Lahn, B. T. (2008).''' [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2715140/ Genetic basis of human brain evolution. ''Trends in Neurosciences'']'', 31''(12), 637–644.</ref> and [[wikipedia:Intelligence|intelligence]] are responsible of driving '''mechanical capabilities''' associated with the evolution of the lobes <ref>However, mental states remain an '''abstract concept''' within this emerging science—one that is extensively explored through [[wikipedia:Analytical_psychology|Analytics]], keen to the wiki, and integral to what this excerpt seeks to demonstrate to [[wikipedia:Neuroscience|neuroscience]].</ref>.<blockquote>''The mere formulation of a problem is far more essential than its solution, which may be merely a matter of mathematical or experimental skills. To raise new questions, new possibilities, to regard old problems from a new angle requires creative imagination'' (...)  <ref>Albert Einstein</ref></blockquote>[[wikipedia:Creativity|Creativity]] <ref>'''van den Berk, T. (2012).''' ''Jung on art: The autonomy of the creative drive.'' Taylor & Francis Group.</ref> <ref>Carl Jung saw creativity as an '''autonomous function of the psyche'''. This means that for him, creativity was not merely a conscious effort but a spontaneous process arising from the '''depths of the unconscious'''. He believed that our unconscious is a powerful source of creativity, which is further driven and seeded in the collective unconscious—a vast reservoir of shared human experiences and archetypes. This creative force operates independently, manifesting in dreams, fantasies, and spontaneous artistic expressions. Pekonen, Y. (2024, July 15). ''[https://www.iabet.fi/blog/jung-on-creativity Jung on creativity]''. IABET.</ref> is a curious phenomenon; the same mind that formulates ideas is also '''susceptible to the bias of experiencing them'''. While the scientific method provides a structured approach to mitigating this bias, '''earlier civilizations lacked such a framework''', making it difficult to distinguish objective reality from perception. As societies evolved, this struggle extended beyond knowledge itself, shaping the '''very political and ideological structures that govern progress'''.
+Language is fundamental to human evolution as a whole. [[wikipedia:Contemporary_history|Before]] the pre-modern era, it functioned as a complex form of [[wikipedia:Biological_interaction|biological interaction]]. As explored in the [[Vocals]] segment, the '''nature of creation is examined''' <ref>A chicken-and-egg problem is shown to exist between the '''emergence of symbolic thought and language''': language is said to be the medium of symbolic thought, but it is reasoned that mastery of language would first require the ability to think symbolically. The solution of this chicken-and-egg problem, according to Deacon, is the subtle evolutionary process of '''co-evolution'''. ''[[wikipedia:The_Symbolic_Species|The Symbolic Species]].'' Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.</ref> <ref>'''Deacon, T. W. (1997).''' ''The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain.'' W.W. Norton & Company.</ref> through the emergence of language among [[wikipedia:Language#Origin|early men]] and its parallel development of symbolism <ref>'''Bednarik, R. G. (2014).''' [https://www.academia.edu/82235063/The_origins_of_symboling The origins of symboling]. ''Signs - International Journal of Semiotics'', 8, 1–29.</ref>. ''[[wikipedia:Non-physical_entity|Non-physical entities]]'' <ref>As of today, [[wikipedia:Miracle|miracles]] '''constitute a significant aspect''' of what the [[wikipedia:Canon_law_of_the_Catholic_Church|canon law of the Catholic Church]] recognizes as holy. While ''Zeus'' remains religiously neutral and does not objectify any particular faith, Catholicism is used in this example due to its potential familiarity to the reader. However, any '''sufficiently complex''' religious sanctuary with a similar structure should be equally recognizable as a representation of such an entity.</ref> are argued to have emerged as complementary aspects of the environment, as human evolution was primarily driven by the development of the [[wikipedia:Mind|mind]] rather than the brain <ref>'''Bednarik, R. G. (2023).''' [[The emergence of mind: A dualistic understanding]]. ''Journal of Mind and Behavior'', 44(2), 123–145.</ref> <ref>Moreira-Almeida, A., & Araujo, S. F. (2018). [https://www.scielo.br/j/rbp/a/CdVJSYK576TzLXYY8ywmnWL/ The presentation of the mind-brain problem in leading psychiatry journals]. ''Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria'', 40(3), 335–342.</ref> <ref>Add proof of the hollow brain guy</ref>. This suggests that as ''sapiens'' shape their societies, a '''tandem evolution occurs between''' [[wikipedia:Symbol|'''symbolic''']] '''cognition and religious practices''' <ref>Without any causal relation whatsoever, '''all''' '''ancient civilizations''' had as a core functioning structure of villages, a spiritual temple. See [[wikipedia:Ziggurat|Ziggurat]] for an example of kind of enigmatic structure where the ancient religious practice took place, furtherly developed on the pyramid's proof [ref].</ref> <ref>'''Chilton, P., & Kopytowska, M. (2018).''' [https://academic.oup.com/book/12438/chapter-abstract/162053479?redirectedFrom=fulltext Introduction: Religion as a cognitive and linguistic phenomenon]. In P. Chilton & M. Kopytowska (Eds.), ''Religion, language, and the human mind'' (pp. xvii–lii). Oxford University Press.</ref>, whereas its counterpart—neural mutation <ref>'''Vallender, E. J., Mekel-Bobrov, N., & Lahn, B. T. (2008).''' [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2715140/ Genetic basis of human brain evolution. ''Trends in Neurosciences'']'', 31''(12), 637–644.</ref> and [[wikipedia:Intelligence|intelligence]], responsible of driving '''mechanical capabilities''' associated with the evolution of the lobes <ref>However, mental states remain an '''abstract concept''' within this emerging science—one that is extensively explored through [[wikipedia:Analytical_psychology|Analytics]], keen to the wiki, and integral to what this excerpt seeks to demonstrate to [[wikipedia:Neuroscience|neuroscience]].</ref> do not accomplish the task of '''nurturing''', but rather of '''logic'''.<blockquote>''The mere formulation of a problem is far more essential than its solution, which may be merely a matter of mathematical or experimental skills. To raise new questions, new possibilities, to regard old problems from a new angle requires creative imagination'' (...)  <ref>Albert Einstein</ref></blockquote>[[wikipedia:Creativity|Creativity]] <ref>'''van den Berk, T. (2012).''' ''Jung on art: The autonomy of the creative drive.'' Taylor & Francis Group.</ref> <ref>Carl Jung saw creativity as an '''autonomous function of the psyche'''. This means that for him, creativity was not merely a conscious effort but a spontaneous process arising from the '''depths of the unconscious'''. He believed that our unconscious is a powerful source of creativity, which is further driven and seeded in the collective unconscious—a vast reservoir of shared human experiences and archetypes. This creative force operates independently, manifesting in dreams, fantasies, and spontaneous artistic expressions. Pekonen, Y. (2024, July 15). ''[https://www.iabet.fi/blog/jung-on-creativity Jung on creativity]''. IABET.</ref> is a curious phenomenon; it seems strange to affirm there must be a task at relay as if technology since the creation of the stone tool was conveyed by logical development of the lobes. This is closely tied to [[wikipedia:Gödel's_incompleteness_theorems|Gödel's incompleteness theorems]] as an axiom of any sort relies on the extrapolation of an initial point where some formal system exerts mathematical weigh to an argument, of which seems to be untrue, as there is no initial point but rather an emergence of qualities. Perhaps what Gödel was aiming to comprehend by disproving of possible ways to determine truth of natural sets, and therefore questioning its consistency, is that to develop any form of language there must be an incoherency bias to numbers and living beings, that relies on a task of polar paradoxical states by which our own scientifical systems fails in nurturing.
-== Politics ==
-While further developed in the [[Signe]] segment, is important to note how [[wikipedia:Sanity|sanity]] is a widely recognized and important subject of Psychology <ref>'''Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2006).''' [https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-02176-002 Intelligence testing with divergent thinking tasks: A double-edged sword]. ''The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40''(1), 1–3.</ref>. Paired with aforementioned political affairs of men, there is little room to discuss the [[wikipedia:Supernatural|supernatural]] without generally resorting to arguments of [[wikipedia:Hallucination|hallucinatory]] experience <ref>'''Larøi, F., Luhrmann, T. M., Bell, V., Christian, W. A., Deshpande, S., Fernyhough, C., Jenkins, J., & Woods, A. (2014).''' [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4141319/ Culture and hallucinations: Overview and future directions]. ''Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40''(Suppl 4), S213–S220. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbu012</nowiki></ref> <ref>'''Pechey, R., & Halligan, P. (2011).''' [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21196811/ The prevalence of delusion-like beliefs relative to sociocultural beliefs in the general population]. ''Psychopathology, 44''(2), 106–115. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1159/000319788</nowiki></ref>. As a tenet point of '''''Zeus''''', that prior to the dawn of the [[wikipedia:Roman_Empire|Roman Empire]] <ref>Albeit a complex topic on its own, it is to note that the prophecy of Jesus, and its close tie to the Roman Empire is related as a '''major shift in societal behavior''', as the '''Anno Domini''' marked the beginning of a new world. This is fourthly developed in [[The man and the empire]], however, and notably, a '''deep and intricate subject of this research'''. Even so, the argument can be discarded for sake of congruency, as the pre-modern man ''in general'' would be liable of such effect, and therefore that it is a delicacy of the structure of the research that the Middle Ages are not affected by the following argument.</ref>, language was primarily a tool for articulating the ''animistic'' nature of matter <ref>'''Conceptual Foundations:'''
-'''Jungian Psychology:''' The ''anima'' represents the unconscious projection of life onto external objects.
-'''Animism:''' Indigenous traditions view all things—living and non-living—as possessing '''a spirit or consciousness''', shaping early worldviews.
+If [[wikipedia:Archetype|Archetypes]] are the '''universal cognitive structures''' that shape the [[wikipedia:Collective_unconscious|collective unconscious]], guiding human perception and behavior, then [[Alchetypes]] are their '''externalized counterparts''', where '''extelligence''' and the [[The will of the spirit|spirit's will]] operate, that describe a more suitable approach to the incompleteness theorems.
-'''Mysticism (Mistic):''' The author expands animism by incorporating '''esoteric and supernatural forces''', suggesting that matter serves as '''a bridge between the physical and metaphysical realms'''.</ref> <ref>One good example of such, is the [[wikipedia:Aegis#In_Greek_mythology|Aegis]]. '''Anima''' is described by the yielding of tools forged by the Gods, possessing powers beyond common tools, e.g., a shield, for that matter.</ref>. This is directly tied to the description of miracles''',''' [[wikipedia:Magic_(supernatural)|magic]], and furthermore the formation of Canon Law—not as a spiritual doctrine alone, but as '''a structural necessity for maintaining''' [[wikipedia:Reality|'''reality''']]. Hallucinations, rather than being understood as psychological phenomena, must be perceived as the primary propagation mechanism of [[Supernatural energy|supernatural ''energy'']]''.''
+=== Lorem ===
-* If [[wikipedia:Archetype|Archetypes]] are the '''universal cognitive structures''' that shape the [[wikipedia:Collective_unconscious|collective unconscious]], guiding human perception and behavior, then [[Alchetypes]] are their '''externalized counterparts''', where '''extelligence''' and the [[The will of the spirit|spirit's will]] operate'''.'''
+Ipsum
-In the modern era, the ''process of [[wikipedia:Discovery_(observation)|discovery]]'' has '''stagnated''', as humanity has entered a '''critical state of complexity''' <ref>The dominance of reductionism has driven progress since the Scientific Revolution. However, this approach has fostered a '''siloed structure''', where fields operate independently. This lack of interconnectedness hinders our ability to address '''complex, interdisciplinary challenges'''. Fragmentation obstructs solutions to new scientifical breakthrough, which demand collaboration across disciplines. It also constrains our '''understanding of reality''', as gaps persist between domains such as physics and neuroscience. Mechanistic worldviews, focused on isolated phenomena, fail to account for emergent properties.</ref>. The [[wikipedia:Technology|technological]] systems that underpin society have grown so advanced that the act of developing knowledge and the act of executing it have diverged entirely. Progress, once measured by new insights, is now dictated by the ability to navigate pre-existing systems rather than creating new paradigms. The ideological dominance of '''[[wikipedia:Atheism|Atheism]] dissolved trough the [[wikipedia:Occident|Ocidental]] culture''' <ref>Atheism, once a fringe position, has become a '''dominant intellectual force''' in Western culture, largely due to '''scientific advancements, philosophical materialism, and secular governance'''. From Greek rationalism to the Enlightenment and modern secular humanism, the West has systematically challenged religious authority, promoting reason, empiricism, and '''individual autonomy''' over faith-based worldviews.</ref>, framed as the propagation of progress, has inadvertently shaped '''a culture of intellectual pride''', where the ego is overwhelmed by the power of a new form of '''"[[wikipedia:Creationism|Creationism]]"—that of the mind''' <ref>lorem</ref>.
+== This research ==
 However external, the [[wikipedia:Academy|scientific academia]], the [[wikipedia:Business|business enterprise]], and the '''self-pride''' that accompanies success are '''reflections of the behavioral structures of the [[Acropolis]]'''. The power vested in [[wikipedia:Authority|authorities]], along with the demonstrations of mastery perpetuated by global media, reveals a pattern: despite vast political and cultural differences, '''humanity remains driven by the need for proof of reproduction'''—be it biological, intellectual, or structural.
@@ Line 53: / Line 47: @@
 This is '''''Zeus'''''—a system that supports [[Lux]], by allowing the comprehension of Nature as a living entity and thus offering ways to surpass the ill-based network of globalization the 21<sup>st</sup> century has been experiencing, while remaining '''akin to the modern man'''. See [[Avatar]], [[The Hub]], [[XR]] and [[LVLUP]] toolkits for further insights.
 * This methodology is based on Thread & Tradition <ref>The engine is powered by a novelty '''language system based on the evolution of comprehension of time''' (i.e., not as in relativity, but rather of '''ancient wisdom'''), that runs on [[wikipedia:Threaded_code|threaded code]] to transfer '''situation comprehensive information''', as well as a '''theory of mind'''. They must be complex and demanding tasks, not suitable for computers to run, if not otherwise processed by the compiler presented by this engine.</ref> <ref>Furthermore, Alchetypes must be a way to extract the theory of mind from the environment and '''dynamically extrapolate''' their Archetypes into a '''comprehensible, marketable, insightful and playful manner'''.</ref>.
-* It relies on the prediction that digital worlds will be the best way to overcome overpopulation, poverty, psychological warfare, and other lingering issues of the current era, by relying on free space <ref>Free space refers to '''areas used by society that categorize on leisure, or otherwise, non-categorized at all'''. They oftentimes are limited by, if not exclusive to transit, resting, or serve as infrastructure for trivial objects and nature. Generally, can be described as lacking consistent qualities of life.</ref> as means to expand our societal areas of contact <ref>'''Lee, L.-H., Braud, T., Zhou, P., Wang, L., Xu, D., Lin, Z., Kumar, A., Bermejo, C., & Hui, P. (2021)'''. [https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10507201 The Metaverse: Survey, trends, novel pipeline ecosystem & future directions]. ''IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems'', 51(11), 4854–4875. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2021.3053212</nowiki></ref> <ref>'''Jauhiainen, J. S. (2024).''' [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096248724000183 The Metaverse: Innovations and generative AI]. ''International Journal of Innovation Studies'', 8(3), 262–272. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2024.04.004</nowiki></ref>.
+* It relies on the prediction that digital worlds will be the way to overcome overpopulation, poverty, psychological warfare, and other lingering issues of the current era, by relying on free space <ref>Free space refers to '''areas used by society that categorize on leisure, or otherwise, non-categorized at all'''. They oftentimes are limited by, if not exclusive to transit, resting, or serve as infrastructure for trivial objects and nature. Generally, can be described as lacking consistent qualities of life.</ref> as means to expand our societal areas of contact <ref>'''Lee, L.-H., Braud, T., Zhou, P., Wang, L., Xu, D., Lin, Z., Kumar, A., Bermejo, C., & Hui, P. (2021)'''. [https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10507201 The Metaverse: Survey, trends, novel pipeline ecosystem & future directions]. ''IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems'', 51(11), 4854–4875. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2021.3053212</nowiki></ref> <ref>'''Jauhiainen, J. S. (2024).''' [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096248724000183 The Metaverse: Innovations and generative AI]. ''International Journal of Innovation Studies'', 8(3), 262–272. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2024.04.004</nowiki></ref>.
 At last, and notably, so far as religion is introduced in the context of the Scientifical method, nowhere is the '''meaning of God discussed''', such that the author presupposes the arrangement of this topic as '''separate from the others''', since it disposes of [[Om]] <ref>'''Om''' is a '''sacred sound, syllable, mantra, and an invocation in Hinduism'''. It is regarded as the '''sacred sound of the universe''', representing the ultimate reality that unifies everything in the universe. Chanting Om is a purifying experience and it symbolizes spiritual awakening and the Universe as a whole.</ref>, a '''special type''' <ref>Regarding to this statement, the author notes that all religions portray some form of ''animism'', and the '''language of God'''. However, ''Om'' is reinforced as sacred to '''''Zeus''''' because it stems from the systematization of the elements of '''logic''' of this research, and of the '''doctrine created to structure them'''.</ref> of Religious method, as it is directly tied to true Linguistics—and furthermore Physics, as this introduction displays.
 == Notes and References ==