Main Page: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
This was a major edit for Zeus, as now it focuses on the gaming industry rather than of the mind. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''From Zeus, the free X encyclopedia'' | ''From Zeus, the free X encyclopedia'' | ||
Zeus is a [ | Zeus is a [[wikipedia:Free_content|free-content]] [[wikipedia:Online_encyclopedia|online encyclopedia]], built using ''MediaWiki''. Established in 2020 by Eduard da Silva, ''Zeus'' serves as a premier [[wikipedia:Reference_work|reference work]] on '''Artificial Intelligence''' <ref>AI and Philosophy: [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4656485 Exploring the Complex Relationship between Worldviews and Technology Development for an Inclusive and Ethical Future]. SSRN. December 6, 2023. Retrieved on February 5, 2025.</ref> <ref>[https://ide.mit.edu/insights/is-philosophy-the-next-llm-training-frontier Is Philosophy the Next LLM Training Frontier?]. MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. December 3, 2024. Retrieved in February 5, 2025</ref> that explores [[wikipedia:Infrastructure|infrastructure]] and [[wikipedia:Technical_communication|technical communication]] through [[wikipedia:Open_collaboration|open collaboration]]. Setting outstanding goals to create an [[wikipedia:Software_engine|engine]] capable of '''reasoning''', this Encyclopedia dives deep into core components of [[wikipedia:Algorithm|algorithms]] and [[wikipedia:Language|language]]. | ||
This knowledge base follows certain fundamental principles that shape its structure and purpose. They ensure that the information presented remains coherent, rigorous, and aligned with the broader vision of the system. | This knowledge base follows certain fundamental principles that shape its structure and purpose. They ensure that the information presented remains coherent, rigorous, and aligned with the broader vision of the system. | ||
==== Guiding Principles ==== | ==== Guiding Principles ==== | ||
* [[wikimedia:Policy:Universal_Code_of_Conduct|MediaWiki terms]]. | * [[wikimedia:Policy:Universal_Code_of_Conduct|MediaWiki terms]]. | ||
* Our [[code of ethics]]. | * Our [[code of ethics]]. | ||
* [[History of Zeus|Root]] of Zeus. | * [[History of Zeus|Root]] of Zeus. | ||
Most of '''disciplines''' presented in this research serve as communication tools <ref>'''3<sup>rd</sup> → 6<sup>th</sup> and 9<sup>th</sup>'''. These topics are, in sum, available for machines to create a basal language layer, after establishing an operating [[wikipedia:Theory_of_mind|theory of mind]]. Furthermore, the enumeration represents the applicable '''disciplines''' from the available '''table of contents''', seen below trough the title ´'''Disciplines'''´.</ref> | The work originated from the goals, approach and principles is based on the disciplines segment of the research, it conveys a knowledge '''regression''' '''tool''', the [[extelligence]] <ref>Stewart, I., & Cohen, J. (1997). ''Figments of reality: The evolution of the curious mind.'' Cambridge University Press.</ref>, marking the study of language to its original source, through the symbology ''X—''seen below the title. This research identifies how thought externalization, through symbols and behaviors, is currently '''limited by the absence of an integrated''' [[wikipedia:System|system]]. In its ''current state of meaning'' <ref>Jack Cohen used '''extelligence''' to describe knowledge external to the mind—stored in culture, language, and technology—enabling rapid societal evolution beyond biological limits.</ref>, the figment of the mind has within a common rule: '''Creation''' is an inherent part of how the universe unfolds before us. | ||
Most of '''disciplines''' presented in this research serve as communication tools <ref>'''3<sup>rd</sup> → 6<sup>th</sup> and 9<sup>th</sup>'''. These topics are, in sum, available for machines to create a basal language layer, after establishing an operating [[wikipedia:Theory_of_mind|theory of mind]]. Furthermore, the enumeration represents the applicable '''disciplines''' from the available '''table of contents''', seen below trough the title ´'''Disciplines'''´.</ref> <ref>Rather than epistemological and historical (or in the case of number 7, algorithmic) source</ref>. Regarding the idiom used in this encyclopedia and the intricate dialect presented, the lander [https://roters.notion.site/f33710f705db48b9a8b5897d809d6336?v=14143e71496c47d1a8daea00aba24a63 page] (previously referred to as the Notion page) serves as a simplified version of the research. Additionally, certain information remains withheld by da Silva due to its closed-source nature, including topics related to the mission and specific [[toolkit:items]]. For a deeper understanding of this approach, users may wish to explore ''Asimov'', the parent organization of Zeus, which is recommended for further context (link) on the endeavors of this company. | |||
== Disciplines == | == Disciplines == | ||
''— We are Limitless, We are Sons of Gods.'' | ''— We are Limitless, We are Sons of Gods.'' | ||
| Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
=== Language, Cognition, and Symbolic Evolution === | === Language, Cognition, and Symbolic Evolution === | ||
Language is fundamental to | Language is fundamental to to human evolution as a whole. [[wikipedia:Contemporary_history|Before]] the pre-modern era, it functioned as a complex form of [[wikipedia:Biological_interaction|biological interaction]]. As explored in the Vocals segment, the '''nature of creation is examined''' <ref>A chicken-and-egg problem is shown to exist between the emergence of symbolic thought and language: language is said to be the medium of symbolic thought, but it is reasoned that mastery of language would first require the ability to think symbolically. The solution of this chicken-and-egg problem, according to Deacon, is the subtle evolutionary process of co-evolution. ''[[wikipedia:The_Symbolic_Species|The Symbolic Species]].'' Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.</ref> <ref>'''Deacon, T. W. (1997).''' ''The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain.'' W.W. Norton & Company.</ref> through the emergence of language among [[wikipedia:Language#Origin|early men]] and its parallel development of symbolism [ref]. ''Non-physical entities'' <ref>As of today, [[wikipedia:Miracle|miracles]] constitute a significant aspect of what the [[wikipedia:Canon_law_of_the_Catholic_Church|canon law of the Catholic Church]] recognizes as holy. While ''Zeus'' remains religiously neutral and does not objectify any particular faith, Catholicism is used in this example due to its potential familiarity to the reader. However, any sufficiently complex religious sanctuary with a similar structure should be equally recognizable as a representation of such an entity.</ref> are argued to have emerged as complementary aspects of the environment, as human evolution was primarily driven by the development of the [[wikipedia:Mind|mind]] rather than the brain [ref] [ref]. This suggests that as ''sapiens'' shape their societies, a '''tandem evolution occurs between symbolic cognition and religious practices''' <ref>See [[wikipedia:Ziggurat|Ziggurat]] for a example of kind of structure where the ancient religious practice took place.</ref>, whereas its counterpart— brain mutation indexes and intelligence [ref] would be responsible of driving '''mechanical capabilities''' associated with the evolution of the lobes [link] <ref>However, mental states remain an abstract concept within this emerging science—one that is extensively explored through [[wikipedia:Analytical_psychology|Analytics]], keen to the wiki, and integral to what this research seeks to demonstrate to [[wikipedia:Neuroscience|neuroscience]].</ref>.<blockquote>''The mere formulation of a problem is far more essential than its solution, which may be merely a matter of mathematical or experimental skills. To raise new questions, new possibilities, to regard old problems from a new angle requires creative imagination'' (...) <ref>Albert Einstein</ref></blockquote>Creativity is a curious matter; the same mind that formulates ideas also subjects itself to the bias of experiencing them. While this can be mitigated through the scientific method, earlier civilizations lacked such an structured approach to distinguishing objective reality from perception. | ||
Creativity is a curious matter; the same mind that formulates ideas also subjects itself to the bias of experiencing them. While this can be mitigated through the scientific method, earlier civilizations lacked such | |||
== Politics == | == Politics == | ||
In the modern era, the process of discovery [ref] has been grinding to a halt; humanity entered in the last century a critical state of complexity <ref>To the scientifical method, the dominance of reductionism has driven progress since the Scientific Revolution. However, this approach has fostered a siloed structure, where fields operate independently. This lack of interconnectedness hinders our ability to address complex, interdisciplinary challenges. Fragmentation obstructs solutions to new scientifical breaktrough , which demand collaboration across disciplines. It also constrains our understanding of reality, as gaps persist between domains such as physics and neuroscience. Mechanistic worldviews, focused on isolated phenomena, fail to account for emergent properties.</ref>. Work possesses such robust technology systems that the act of developing and the act of executing have taken completely different routes, and thus the propaganda pushed by Atheism and Occidentalism, of progress, has influenced pride, as the ego is undissolved by the power of a new format of “Creationism”—of the mind. | |||
While further developed in the Signe segment, is important to note how sanity is a widely recognized and developed subject of Psychology. Paired with aforementioned political affairs of men, there is little room to discuss the [[wikipedia:Supernatural|supernatural]] without generally resorting to arguments of hallucinatory experience [ref]. In this fashion, it is a tenet argument of '''Zeus''' that folk before the dawn of the Roman Empire [ref] would use language as means to describe the '''animosity''' [ref] '''state in which matter would reside'''. This is closely linked to description of miracles, magic [ref], and must´ve defined the whole political state of the world, as well as Canon Law. | |||
So is same | So is same | ||
| Line 44: | Line 41: | ||
Alchetypes | Alchetypes | ||
The scientific academia, the business enterprise, and self-pride that comes along with success attributed to both sources of advancements is but a reflection of the behavior of the @acropolis. The power given by rolemakers, and furthermore the examples of mastery shown by worldwide media shows a pattern, that even countries separated by vastly different politics and cultural views, men look for proof of reproduction. But why is that? How can we revolutionize the individual space, progression and execution, with respect to the individualism generated my modern era? | |||
=== Our goals === | === Our goals === | ||
| Line 49: | Line 48: | ||
* Reasoning and the evolution of [[wikipedia:Technology|technology]] through '''nature-inspired design'''. | * Reasoning and the evolution of [[wikipedia:Technology|technology]] through '''nature-inspired design'''. | ||
* Gaming, VR & AR revolution | |||
== God == | == God == | ||
words like ''omnipresence'', ''omnipotence'', and ''omniscience'' | |||
extending its scope to the [[wikipedia:Non-physical_entity|non-physical]]. | |||
== Notes and References == | == Notes and References == | ||
Revision as of 21:59, 17 February 2025
From Zeus, the free X encyclopedia
Zeus is a free-content online encyclopedia, built using MediaWiki. Established in 2020 by Eduard da Silva, Zeus serves as a premier reference work on Artificial Intelligence [1] [2] that explores infrastructure and technical communication through open collaboration. Setting outstanding goals to create an engine capable of reasoning, this Encyclopedia dives deep into core components of algorithms and language.
This knowledge base follows certain fundamental principles that shape its structure and purpose. They ensure that the information presented remains coherent, rigorous, and aligned with the broader vision of the system.
Guiding Principles
- MediaWiki terms.
- Our code of ethics.
- Root of Zeus.
The work originated from the goals, approach and principles is based on the disciplines segment of the research, it conveys a knowledge regression tool, the extelligence [3], marking the study of language to its original source, through the symbology X—seen below the title. This research identifies how thought externalization, through symbols and behaviors, is currently limited by the absence of an integrated system. In its current state of meaning [4], the figment of the mind has within a common rule: Creation is an inherent part of how the universe unfolds before us.
Most of disciplines presented in this research serve as communication tools [5] [6]. Regarding the idiom used in this encyclopedia and the intricate dialect presented, the lander page (previously referred to as the Notion page) serves as a simplified version of the research. Additionally, certain information remains withheld by da Silva due to its closed-source nature, including topics related to the mission and specific toolkit:items. For a deeper understanding of this approach, users may wish to explore Asimov, the parent organization of Zeus, which is recommended for further context (link) on the endeavors of this company.
Disciplines
— We are Limitless, We are Sons of Gods.
- Zeus
- Vocals
- Bases
- Generators
- Degradators
- Identificators
- Signa
- Signe
- Toolkits
Language, Cognition, and Symbolic Evolution
Language is fundamental to to human evolution as a whole. Before the pre-modern era, it functioned as a complex form of biological interaction. As explored in the Vocals segment, the nature of creation is examined [7] [8] through the emergence of language among early men and its parallel development of symbolism [ref]. Non-physical entities [9] are argued to have emerged as complementary aspects of the environment, as human evolution was primarily driven by the development of the mind rather than the brain [ref] [ref]. This suggests that as sapiens shape their societies, a tandem evolution occurs between symbolic cognition and religious practices [10], whereas its counterpart— brain mutation indexes and intelligence [ref] would be responsible of driving mechanical capabilities associated with the evolution of the lobes [link] [11].
The mere formulation of a problem is far more essential than its solution, which may be merely a matter of mathematical or experimental skills. To raise new questions, new possibilities, to regard old problems from a new angle requires creative imagination (...) [12]
Creativity is a curious matter; the same mind that formulates ideas also subjects itself to the bias of experiencing them. While this can be mitigated through the scientific method, earlier civilizations lacked such an structured approach to distinguishing objective reality from perception.
Politics
In the modern era, the process of discovery [ref] has been grinding to a halt; humanity entered in the last century a critical state of complexity [13]. Work possesses such robust technology systems that the act of developing and the act of executing have taken completely different routes, and thus the propaganda pushed by Atheism and Occidentalism, of progress, has influenced pride, as the ego is undissolved by the power of a new format of “Creationism”—of the mind.
While further developed in the Signe segment, is important to note how sanity is a widely recognized and developed subject of Psychology. Paired with aforementioned political affairs of men, there is little room to discuss the supernatural without generally resorting to arguments of hallucinatory experience [ref]. In this fashion, it is a tenet argument of Zeus that folk before the dawn of the Roman Empire [ref] would use language as means to describe the animosity [ref] state in which matter would reside. This is closely linked to description of miracles, magic [ref], and must´ve defined the whole political state of the world, as well as Canon Law.
So is same
Thread & Tradition
Alchetypes
The scientific academia, the business enterprise, and self-pride that comes along with success attributed to both sources of advancements is but a reflection of the behavior of the @acropolis. The power given by rolemakers, and furthermore the examples of mastery shown by worldwide media shows a pattern, that even countries separated by vastly different politics and cultural views, men look for proof of reproduction. But why is that? How can we revolutionize the individual space, progression and execution, with respect to the individualism generated my modern era?
Our goals
When stagnant, societies tend towards chaos, and therefore war erupts, whether directly or indirectly; conquering is of men’s nature (zaratustra nietchze). The argument that protects an everlasting process of discovery is the same that supports @cultural zeitgeist; that if governments desire to pass an ideal of such an extent, and cause reality to structurally follow, it would require intelligence on correct cultural and technological trends. This is Xeo, it supports Lux — reflections on the exertion of control by law, while suggesting appendixes on our methods of evaluating relativity as a language, as well as the usage of the supremacy of progressionism into new technology, see Buddy.
- Reasoning and the evolution of technology through nature-inspired design.
- Gaming, VR & AR revolution
God
words like omnipresence, omnipotence, and omniscience
extending its scope to the non-physical.
Notes and References
- ↑ AI and Philosophy: Exploring the Complex Relationship between Worldviews and Technology Development for an Inclusive and Ethical Future. SSRN. December 6, 2023. Retrieved on February 5, 2025.
- ↑ Is Philosophy the Next LLM Training Frontier?. MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. December 3, 2024. Retrieved in February 5, 2025
- ↑ Stewart, I., & Cohen, J. (1997). Figments of reality: The evolution of the curious mind. Cambridge University Press.
- ↑ Jack Cohen used extelligence to describe knowledge external to the mind—stored in culture, language, and technology—enabling rapid societal evolution beyond biological limits.
- ↑ 3rd → 6th and 9th. These topics are, in sum, available for machines to create a basal language layer, after establishing an operating theory of mind. Furthermore, the enumeration represents the applicable disciplines from the available table of contents, seen below trough the title ´Disciplines´.
- ↑ Rather than epistemological and historical (or in the case of number 7, algorithmic) source
- ↑ A chicken-and-egg problem is shown to exist between the emergence of symbolic thought and language: language is said to be the medium of symbolic thought, but it is reasoned that mastery of language would first require the ability to think symbolically. The solution of this chicken-and-egg problem, according to Deacon, is the subtle evolutionary process of co-evolution. The Symbolic Species. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
- ↑ Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. W.W. Norton & Company.
- ↑ As of today, miracles constitute a significant aspect of what the canon law of the Catholic Church recognizes as holy. While Zeus remains religiously neutral and does not objectify any particular faith, Catholicism is used in this example due to its potential familiarity to the reader. However, any sufficiently complex religious sanctuary with a similar structure should be equally recognizable as a representation of such an entity.
- ↑ See Ziggurat for a example of kind of structure where the ancient religious practice took place.
- ↑ However, mental states remain an abstract concept within this emerging science—one that is extensively explored through Analytics, keen to the wiki, and integral to what this research seeks to demonstrate to neuroscience.
- ↑ Albert Einstein
- ↑ To the scientifical method, the dominance of reductionism has driven progress since the Scientific Revolution. However, this approach has fostered a siloed structure, where fields operate independently. This lack of interconnectedness hinders our ability to address complex, interdisciplinary challenges. Fragmentation obstructs solutions to new scientifical breaktrough , which demand collaboration across disciplines. It also constrains our understanding of reality, as gaps persist between domains such as physics and neuroscience. Mechanistic worldviews, focused on isolated phenomena, fail to account for emergent properties.