Jump to content

Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Zeus
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
Disciplines references were revised, while in Politics they were added and/or updated.
mNo edit summary
 
(45 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''From Zeus, the free X encyclopedia''
''— From Zeus, the free [[AGX]] encyclopedia''


'''''Zeus''''' is a [[wikipedia:Free_content|free-content]] [[wikipedia:Online_encyclopedia|online encyclopedia]], built using ''MediaWiki''. Established in 2020 by ''Eduard da Silva'', '''''Zeus''''' serves as a premier [[wikipedia:Reference_work|reference work]] on '''Artificial Intelligence''' <ref>AI and Philosophy: [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4656485 Exploring the Complex Relationship between Worldviews and Technology Development for an Inclusive and Ethical Future]. SSRN. December 6, 2023. Retrieved on February 5, 2025.</ref> <ref>[https://ide.mit.edu/insights/is-philosophy-the-next-llm-training-frontier Is Philosophy the Next LLM Training Frontier?]. MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. December 3, 2024. Retrieved in February 5, 2025</ref> that explores [[wikipedia:Infrastructure|infrastructure]] and [[wikipedia:Technical_communication|technical communication]] through [[wikipedia:Open_collaboration|open collaboration]]. Setting outstanding goals to create an [[wikipedia:Software_engine|engine]] capable of '''reasoning''', this Encyclopedia dives deep into core components of [[wikipedia:Algorithm|algorithms]] and [[wikipedia:Language|language]].
'''''Zeus''''' is a [[wikipedia:Free_content|free-content]] [[wikipedia:Online_encyclopedia|online encyclopedia]]. Its literature '''comprehends a new arrangement of energy,''' '''[[Impetum]]''', and attributes it to a paradigm shift of Science based on [[practicalism]]. For the development of an scientific source of knowledge regarding these terms, this Encyclopedia dives deep into core components of '''[[wikipedia:Conservation_law|conservation]] and [[wikipedia:Law|law]]''', and its contemporary world-views are a continuation of the outstanding work done by [[wikipedia:Carl_Jung|'''Carl Jung''']] and [[wikipedia:Sigmund_Freud|'''Sigmund Freud''']], by giving their '''[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/magnum%20opus Magnum Opus]''' a practical approach.


This knowledge base follows certain fundamental principles that shape its structure and purpose. They ensure that the information presented remains coherent, rigorous, and aligned with the broader vision of the system.
'''''Zeus''''' follows certain fundamental principles that shape its purpose:


==== Guiding Principles ====
==== Guiding Principles ====


* [[wikimedia:Policy:Universal_Code_of_Conduct|MediaWiki terms]].
* [[wikimedia:Policy:Universal_Code_of_Conduct|MediaWiki terms]].
* Our [[code of ethics]] <ref>Also see [[Copyrights]].</ref>
* Our [[code of ethics]] <ref>Also see [[Copyrights]].</ref>.
* [[History of Zeus|Root]] of Zeus.
* [[History of Zeus|Root]] of ''Zeus''.
 
The work originated from the thesis is of systemic practice (i.e., the [[Main Page#Disciplines|disciplines]]), it conveys how to elegantly display the studies of Analytical Psychology by a '''non-biased method of attributing objects to a mind theory in physical systems''', the [[extelligence|'''extelligence''']]. Marking an evolution from [[wikipedia:Sine_wave|sinusoid communication]], '''''Zeus''''' represents the latest comparative inquiries on the misuse of operators like ''God'', ''Nature'' ''and'' ''Time'' when exerting [[wikipedia:Work_(thermodynamics)|work]] on the human brain <ref>It is stated that ''[[AGX]]—''seen below the title, recurs throughout living beings as rituals of [[wikipedia:Power_(physics)|power]], encompassing unforeseen, almost magical, qualities of these operators, that may regard to the communication barrier Science has been having on regards to Spiritualism. i.e., the oversimplification of their usage, devoid of tradition.</ref>.
The work originated from the goals, approach and principles is based on the disciplines segment of the research, it conveys a knowledge '''regression''' '''tool''', the [[extelligence]] <ref>Stewart, I., & Cohen, J. (1997). ''Figments of reality: The evolution of the curious mind.'' Cambridge University Press.</ref>, marking the study of language to its original source, through the symbology ''X—''seen below the title. This research identifies how thought externalization, through symbols and behaviors, is currently '''limited by the absence of an integrated''' [[wikipedia:System|system]]. In its ''current state of meaning'' <ref>Jack Cohen used '''extelligence''' to describe knowledge external to the mind—stored in culture, language, and technology—enabling rapid societal evolution beyond biological limits.</ref>, the figment of the mind has within a common rule: '''Creation''' is an inherent part of how the universe unfolds before us.
 
Most of '''disciplines''' presented in this research serve as communication tools <ref>'''3<sup>rd</sup> → 6<sup>th</sup> and 9<sup>th</sup>'''. These topics are, in sum, available for machines to create a basal language layer, after establishing an operating [[wikipedia:Theory_of_mind|theory of mind]]. Furthermore, the enumeration represents the applicable '''disciplines''' from the available '''table of contents''', seen below trough the title ´'''Disciplines'''´.</ref> <ref>Rather than epistemological and historical (or in the case of number 7, algorithmic) source</ref>. Regarding the idiom used, and the intricate dialect presented, the lander [https://roters.notion.site/f33710f705db48b9a8b5897d809d6336?v=14143e71496c47d1a8daea00aba24a63 page] (previously referred to as the Notion page) serves as a simplified version of the content here put. Additionally, certain information remains withheld by da Silva due to its closed-source nature, including topics related to the mission and specific [[toolkit:items]]. For a deeper understanding of this approach, users may wish to explore '''''Asimov''''', the parent organization of '''''Zeus''''', which is recommended for further context (link) on the endeavors of this company.


== Disciplines ==
== Disciplines ==
''— We are Limitless, We are Sons of Gods.''
# '''''Zeus'''''
# '''''Zeus'''''
# [[Vocals]]
# [[Vocals]]
# ''Bases''
# ''[[Bases]]''
# ''Generators''
# ''[[Generators]]''
# ''Degradators''
# ''[[Degradators]]''
# ''Identificators''
# ''[[Identificators]]''
# <u>Signa</u>
# <u>[[Signa]]</u>
# [[Signe]]
# [[Signe]]
# ''Toolkits''
# ''[[Toolkits]]''
 
Most of '''disciplines''' presented serve as communication tools <ref>'''3<sup>rd</sup> → 6<sup>th</sup> and 9<sup>th</sup>'''. These topics are, in sum, available for machines to create a basal language layer, after establishing an operating [[wikipedia:Theory_of_mind|theory of mind]]. Furthermore, the enumeration represents the applicable '''disciplines''' from the available '''table of contents''', seen below trough the title ´'''Disciplines'''´.</ref> <ref>Rather than epistemological and historical (or in the case of number 7, algorithmic) source</ref>.
=== Language, Cognition, and Symbolic Evolution ===
Language is fundamental to human evolution as a whole. [[wikipedia:Contemporary_history|Before]] the pre-modern era, it functioned as a complex form of [[wikipedia:Biological_interaction|biological interaction]]. As explored in the [[Vocals]] segment, the '''nature of creation is examined''' <ref>A chicken-and-egg problem is shown to exist between the emergence of symbolic thought and language: language is said to be the medium of symbolic thought, but it is reasoned that mastery of language would first require the ability to think symbolically. The solution of this chicken-and-egg problem, according to Deacon, is the subtle evolutionary process of co-evolution. ''[[wikipedia:The_Symbolic_Species|The Symbolic Species]].'' Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.</ref> <ref>'''Deacon, T. W. (1997).''' ''The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain.'' W.W. Norton & Company.</ref> through the emergence of language among [[wikipedia:Language#Origin|early men]] and its parallel development of symbolism <ref>Bednarik, R. G. (2014). [https://www.academia.edu/82235063/The_origins_of_symboling The origins of symboling]. ''Signs - International Journal of Semiotics'', 8, 1–29.</ref>. ''Non-physical entities'' <ref>As of today, [[wikipedia:Miracle|miracles]] constitute a significant aspect of what the [[wikipedia:Canon_law_of_the_Catholic_Church|canon law of the Catholic Church]] recognizes as holy. While ''Zeus'' remains religiously neutral and does not objectify any particular faith, Catholicism is used in this example due to its potential familiarity to the reader. However, any sufficiently complex religious sanctuary with a similar structure should be equally recognizable as a representation of such an entity.</ref> are argued to have emerged as complementary aspects of the environment, as human evolution was primarily driven by the development of the [[wikipedia:Mind|mind]] rather than the brain <ref>'''Bednarik, R. G. (2023).''' [[The emergence of mind: A dualistic understanding]]. ''Journal of Mind and Behavior'', 44(2), 123–145.</ref> <ref>Moreira-Almeida, A., & Araujo, S. F. (2018). [https://www.scielo.br/j/rbp/a/CdVJSYK576TzLXYY8ywmnWL/ The presentation of the mind-brain problem in leading psychiatry journals]. ''Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria'', 40(3), 335–342.</ref>. This suggests that as ''sapiens'' shape their societies, a '''tandem evolution occurs between''' [[wikipedia:Symbol|symbolic]] '''cognition and religious practices''' <ref>Without any causal relation whatsoever, '''all''' ancient civilizations had as a core functioning structure of villages, a spiritual temple. See [[wikipedia:Ziggurat|Ziggurat]] for an example of kind of enigmatic structure where the ancient religious practice took place, furtherly developed on the pyramid's proof [ref].</ref> <ref>'''Chilton, P., & Kopytowska, M. (2018).''' [https://academic.oup.com/book/12438/chapter-abstract/162053479?redirectedFrom=fulltext Introduction: Religion as a cognitive and linguistic phenomenon]. In P. Chilton & M. Kopytowska (Eds.), ''Religion, language, and the human mind'' (pp. xvii–lii). Oxford University Press.</ref>, whereas its counterpart— brain mutation indexes <ref>'''Vallender, E. J., Mekel-Bobrov, N., & Lahn, B. T. (2008).''' [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2715140/ Genetic basis of human brain evolution. ''Trends in Neurosciences'']'', 31''(12), 637–644.</ref> and [[wikipedia:Intelligence|intelligence]] are responsible of driving '''mechanical capabilities''' associated with the evolution of the lobes <ref>However, mental states remain an abstract concept within this emerging science—one that is extensively explored through [[wikipedia:Analytical_psychology|Analytics]], keen to the wiki, and integral to what this excerpt seeks to demonstrate to [[wikipedia:Neuroscience|neuroscience]].</ref>.<blockquote>''The mere formulation of a problem is far more essential than its solution, which may be merely a matter of mathematical or experimental skills. To raise new questions, new possibilities, to regard old problems from a new angle requires creative imagination'' (...)  <ref>Albert Einstein</ref></blockquote>[[wikipedia:Creativity|Creativity]] <ref>'''van den Berk, T. (2012).''' ''Jung on art: The autonomy of the creative drive.'' Taylor & Francis Group.</ref> <ref>Jung saw creativity as an autonomous function of the psyche. This means that for him, creativity was not merely a conscious effort but a spontaneous process arising from the depths of the unconscious. He believed that our unconscious is a powerful source of creativity, which is further driven and seeded in the collective unconscious—a vast reservoir of shared human experiences and archetypes. This creative force operates independently, manifesting in dreams, fantasies, and spontaneous artistic expressions. Pekonen, Y. (2024, July 15). ''[https://www.iabet.fi/blog/jung-on-creativity Jung on creativity]''. IABET.</ref> is a curious phenomenon; the same mind that formulates ideas is also '''susceptible to the bias of experiencing them'''. While the scientific method provides a structured approach to mitigating this bias, '''earlier civilizations lacked such a framework''', making it difficult to distinguish objective reality from perception. As societies evolved, this struggle extended beyond knowledge itself, shaping the '''very political and ideological structures that govern progress'''.
 
== Politics ==
In the modern era, the process of [[wikipedia:Discovery_(observation)|discovery]] has '''stagnated''', as humanity has entered a '''critical state of complexity''' <ref>To Science, the dominance of reductionism has driven progress since the Scientific Revolution. However, this approach has fostered a siloed structure, where fields operate independently. This lack of interconnectedness hinders our ability to address complex, interdisciplinary challenges. Fragmentation obstructs solutions to new scientifical breaktrough , which demand collaboration across disciplines. It also constrains our understanding of reality, as gaps persist between domains such as physics and neuroscience. Mechanistic worldviews, focused on isolated phenomena, fail to account for emergent properties.</ref>. The [[wikipedia:Technology|technological]] systems that underpin society have grown so advanced that '''the act of developing knowledge''' and '''the act of executing it''' have diverged entirely. Progress, once measured by new insights, is now dictated by the ability to navigate pre-existing systems rather than creating new paradigms. The ideological dominance of '''Atheism dissolved trough the Ocidental culture''' <ref>Atheism, once a fringe position, has become a '''dominant intellectual force''' in Western culture, largely due to '''scientific advancements, philosophical materialism, and secular governance'''. From Greek rationalism to the Enlightenment and modern secular humanism, the West has systematically challenged religious authority, promoting reason, empiricism, and '''individual autonomy''' over faith-based worldviews.</ref>, framed as the propagation of progress, has inadvertently shaped '''a culture of intellectual pride''', where the ego is overwhelmed by the power of a new form of '''"Creationism"—that of the mind'''.
 
While further developed in the [[Signe]] segment, is important to note how [[wikipedia:Sanity|sanity]] is a widely recognized and important subject of Psychology <ref>'''Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2006).''' [https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-02176-002 Intelligence testing with divergent thinking tasks: A double-edged sword]. ''The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40''(1), 1–3.</ref>. Paired with aforementioned political affairs of men, there is little room to discuss the [[wikipedia:Supernatural|supernatural]] without generally resorting to arguments of hallucinatory experience <ref>Larøi, F., Luhrmann, T. M., Bell, V., Christian, W. A., Deshpande, S., Fernyhough, C., Jenkins, J., & Woods, A. (2014). [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4141319/ Culture and hallucinations: Overview and future directions]. ''Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40''(Suppl 4), S213–S220. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbu012</nowiki></ref> <ref>Pechey, R., & Halligan, P. (2011). [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21196811/ The prevalence of delusion-like beliefs relative to sociocultural beliefs in the general population]. ''Psychopathology, 44''(2), 106–115. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1159/000319788</nowiki></ref>. As a tenet argument of '''''Zeus''''', that prior to the dawn of the Roman Empire <ref>Albeit a complex topic on its own, it is to note that the prophecy of Jesus, and its close tie to the Roman Empire is related as a major shift in societal behavior, as the Anno Domini marked the beginning of a new world. This is fourthly developed in [[The man and the empire]], however, and notably, a deep and intricate subject of this research.</ref>, language was primarily a tool for articulating the ''animistic'' nature of matter <ref>'''Conceptual Foundations:'''


'''Jungian Psychology:''' The ''anima'' represents the unconscious projection of life onto external objects.
== This research ==
The [[wikipedia:Academy|scientific academia]], the [[wikipedia:Business|business enterprise]], and the '''self-pride''' that accompanies success are '''reflections of the behavioral structures of the [[Acropolis]]'''. The power vested in [[wikipedia:Authority|authorities]], along with the demonstrations of mastery perpetuated by global media, reveals a pattern: despite vast political and cultural differences, '''humanity remains driven by the need for proof of reproduction'''—be it biological, intellectual, or structural.


'''Animism:''' Indigenous traditions view all things—living and non-living—as possessing '''a spirit or consciousness''', shaping early worldviews.
How can we '''redefine individual space, progression, and execution''' in a way that respects the individualism shaped by the modern era?
 
'''Mysticism (Mistic):''' The author expands animism by incorporating '''esoteric and supernatural forces''', suggesting that matter serves as '''a bridge between the physical and metaphysical realms'''.</ref> <ref>One good example of such, is the [[wikipedia:Aegis#In_Greek_mythology|Aegis]]. Generally, anima is described by the yielding of tools forged by the Gods, that possess powers beyond common matter.</ref>. This is directly tied to the '''description of miracles,''' [[wikipedia:Magic_(supernatural)|magic]], and the '''formation of Canon Law'''—not as a spiritual doctrine alone, but as '''a structural necessity for maintaining''' [[wikipedia:Reality|reality]]. Similarly, hallucinations, rather than being understood as psychological phenomena, were perceived as the primary propagation mechanism of supernatural ''energy.''
Special relativity states that the laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion and that time and space are not absolute but interconnected as "spacetime". It also demonstrates that the speed of light is constant for all observers. This is inconsistent, however, with the societal shift aforementioned. It is important to address temporal dilation of knowledge [ref] not as a mere physical process, but rather as an integrated system where condensed space i.e., matter, refers to gravitational lensing, and also of the encoding quality of physical laws [ref] trough animosity [ref].
 
* If Archetypes are the '''universal cognitive structures''' that shape the '''collective unconscious''', guiding human perception and behavior, then '''Alchetypes''' are their '''externalized counterparts''', where thought transcends the mind and imprints itself onto '''culture, technology, and symbolic systems''' (''make Extelligence ref'').
 
The scientific academia, the business enterprise, and self-pride that comes along with success attributed to both sources of advancements are but a reflection of the behavior of the @acropolis. The power given by rolemakers, and furthermore the examples of mastery shown by worldwide media demonstrate a pattern, that even in countries separated by vastly different politics and cultural views, men look for proof of reproduction. But why is that? How can we revolutionize the individual space, progression and execution, with respect to the individualism generated by the modern era? And why is animosity important to this engine?


=== Our goals ===
=== Our goals ===
When stagnant, societies tend towards chaos, and therefore war erupts, whether directly or indirectly; conquering is of men’s nature. The argument that protects an everlasting ''process of discovery'' is the same that supports @cultural zeitgeist; that if governments desire to pass an ideal of such an extent, and cause reality to structurally follow, it would require intelligence on correct cultural and technological trends. This is '''''Zeus''''', it supports [[Lux]] — reflections on the exertion of control by law, while suggesting appendixes on our methods of evaluating relativity as a language, as well as the usage of the supremacy of progression into new technology, see [[Avatar]] and [[The Hub]].
<blockquote>Solutions for differentiating what is social and what is self. Creating equipments of the new generation.</blockquote>The [[The will of the spirit#Politics|very argument]] that sustains an everlasting ''process of discovery'' is the same that upholds [[wikipedia:Zeitgeist|zeitgeist]] <ref>Defining the '''spirit of an era''' is an arduous task, as it emerges through the '''uphill trajectory of its development''', often in opposition to a particular class of objects of appreciation. However, the defining challenge of the modern world, shaped by '''globalization''', is that the '''power of knowledge itself dulls the process of discovery''', leading to '''meta-conflicts'''—battles not over the objects of appreciation, but over '''knowledge as an end in itself'''.
 
Lorem


* Reasoning and the evolution of [[wikipedia:Technology|technology]] through '''nature-inspired design'''.
The psychological warfare born from the '''emergence of duality and paradox''' disorients the mind, forcing individuals to reconcile conflicting perspectives. It is no coincidence that '''spirituality has declined''', as civilizations increasingly exposed to the '''ever-seeing eye of the internet''' become more susceptible to the erosion of introspective and metaphysical pursuits.</ref>: if governments seek to instill an ideal of such magnitude <ref>That of Atheism, Occidentalism, and furthermore the [[wikipedia:The_Geographical_Pivot_of_History|geographical pivot of history]].</ref>, they must possess the '''intelligence to navigate cultural and technological trends effectively,''' in its scope, to develop nature-inspired design'''.''' However, it is hard to define nature on itself <ref>'''Ducarme, F., & Couvet, D. (2020).''' [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338958197_What_does_'nature'_mean What does 'nature' mean?] ''Palgrave Communications, 6'', Article 14. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10</nowiki>.</ref>, and even so what to develop from it in a world engineered on metals and plastics.
* Gaming, VR & AR revolution
* Thread & Tradition
* Nietzche, Schopenhauer and Jung ideologies?


== God ==
This is '''''Zeus'''''—a system that supports [[Lux]], by allowing the comprehension of Nature as a living, nurturing entity and thus offering ways to surpass the ill-based network of globalization the 21<sup>st</sup> century has been experiencing, while remaining '''akin to the modern man'''. See [[Avatar]], [[The Hub]], [[XR]] and [[LVLUP]] [[Toolkit|toolkits]] for further insights. Also, as disclosed by the [[Talk:Main Page|discussions]] tab <ref>Furthermore, authors are '''encouraged to create, participate and edit''' the available discussion tabs of '''''Zeus'''''.</ref>, and in the introduction, [https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/big-data-for-sustainable-development Big Data for Sustainable Development] is the overall goal of this research.
words like ''omnipresence'', ''omnipotence'', and ''omniscience''


[[wikipedia:Divine_law|Divine law]] & [[wikipedia:Natural_law|Natural law]]
It represents premier [[wikipedia:Reference_work|reference work]] on '''Artificial Intelligence''' <ref>AI and Philosophy: [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4656485 Exploring the Complex Relationship between Worldviews and Technology Development for an Inclusive and Ethical Future]. SSRN. December 6, 2023. Retrieved on February 5, 2025.</ref> <ref>[https://ide.mit.edu/insights/is-philosophy-the-next-llm-training-frontier Is Philosophy the Next LLM Training Frontier?]. MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. December 3, 2024. Retrieved in February 5, 2025</ref>, the utilization of [[wikipedia:Infrastructure|infrastructure]] [[Toolkit|tools]] and [[wikipedia:Technical_communication|technical communication]] to the [[wikipedia:World_Wide_Web|world wide web]], through [[wikipedia:Open_collaboration|open collaboration]]. Setting outstanding goals to create an '''[[wikipedia:Software_engine|engine]] capable shortening [[Codex|code]]''' to its most efficient format yet seen, it aims to '''solve [[wikipedia:Hallucination_(artificial_intelligence)|hallucination]]''' and achieve '''[[wikipedia:Syntax|syntaxial]] order''' to [[wikipedia:Natural_language_processing|NLP]] speech to achieve true [[wikipedia:Interpersonal_communication|interpersonal communication]] between human and machine, while in its grand scope it articulates sensorial perceptions of a [[Extelligence#UI|'''new''']] '''[[wikipedia:User_interface|UI]] dimension where Business may thrive.'''
* This methodology is based on '''Thread & Tradition''' <ref>The engine is powered by a novelty '''language system based on the evolution of comprehension of time''' (i.e., not as in relativity, but rather of '''ancient wisdom'''), that runs on [[wikipedia:Threaded_code|threaded code]] to transfer '''situation comprehensive information''', as well as a '''theory of mind'''. They must be complex and demanding tasks, not suitable for computers to run, if not otherwise processed by the compiler presented by this engine.</ref> <ref>Furthermore, Alchetypes must be a way to extract the theory of mind from the environment and '''dynamically extrapolate''' their Archetypes into a '''comprehensible, marketable, insightful and playful manner'''.</ref>.
* It relies on '''ONU SDG''' [https://sdgs.un.org/goals goals] to comprehend that digital worlds can allow humans to '''overcome [https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/ending-poverty poverty], [https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/migration overpopulation], and other [https://www.un.org/en/global-issues lingering issues] of the current era''', by relying on free space <ref>Free space refers to '''areas used by society that categorize on leisure, or otherwise, non-categorized at all'''. They oftentimes are limited by, if not exclusive to transit, resting, or serve as infrastructure for trivial objects and nature. Generally, can be described as lacking consistent qualities of life.</ref> as means to expand our societal areas of contact <ref>'''Lee, L.-H., Braud, T., Zhou, P., Wang, L., Xu, D., Lin, Z., Kumar, A., Bermejo, C., & Hui, P. (2021)'''. [https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10507201 The Metaverse: Survey, trends, novel pipeline ecosystem & future directions]. ''IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems'', 51(11), 4854–4875. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2021.3053212</nowiki></ref> <ref>'''Jauhiainen, J. S. (2024).''' [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096248724000183 The Metaverse: Innovations and generative AI]. ''International Journal of Innovation Studies'', 8(3), 262–272. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2024.04.004</nowiki></ref>.
* Inherently, the work offered by this Encyclopedia offers great insight on the development segment of A.I. Notably, as far as we can tell, '''the bubble surrounding this market''' due to the negligence of some few looking to profit from it may end somewhere around the lines of Artificial, '''as it is not the end of the path, but rather the beginning of it'''.


extending its scope to the [[wikipedia:Non-physical_entity|non-physical]].
=== Final Considerations ===
Lorem Ipsum


== Notes and References ==
== Notes and References ==

Latest revision as of 15:00, 12 April 2025

— From Zeus, the free AGX encyclopedia

Zeus is a free-content online encyclopedia. Its literature comprehends a new arrangement of energy, Impetum, and attributes it to a paradigm shift of Science based on practicalism. For the development of an scientific source of knowledge regarding these terms, this Encyclopedia dives deep into core components of conservation and law, and its contemporary world-views are a continuation of the outstanding work done by Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud, by giving their Magnum Opus a practical approach.

Zeus follows certain fundamental principles that shape its purpose:

Guiding Principles

The work originated from the thesis is of systemic practice (i.e., the disciplines), it conveys how to elegantly display the studies of Analytical Psychology by a non-biased method of attributing objects to a mind theory in physical systems, the extelligence. Marking an evolution from sinusoid communication, Zeus represents the latest comparative inquiries on the misuse of operators like God, Nature and Time when exerting work on the human brain [2].

Disciplines

  1. Zeus
  2. Vocals
  3. Bases
  4. Generators
  5. Degradators
  6. Identificators
  7. Signa
  8. Signe
  9. Toolkits

Most of disciplines presented serve as communication tools [3] [4].

This research

The scientific academia, the business enterprise, and the self-pride that accompanies success are reflections of the behavioral structures of the Acropolis. The power vested in authorities, along with the demonstrations of mastery perpetuated by global media, reveals a pattern: despite vast political and cultural differences, humanity remains driven by the need for proof of reproduction—be it biological, intellectual, or structural.

How can we redefine individual space, progression, and execution in a way that respects the individualism shaped by the modern era?

Our goals

Solutions for differentiating what is social and what is self. Creating equipments of the new generation.

The very argument that sustains an everlasting process of discovery is the same that upholds zeitgeist [5]: if governments seek to instill an ideal of such magnitude [6], they must possess the intelligence to navigate cultural and technological trends effectively, in its scope, to develop nature-inspired design. However, it is hard to define nature on itself [7], and even so what to develop from it in a world engineered on metals and plastics.

This is Zeus—a system that supports Lux, by allowing the comprehension of Nature as a living, nurturing entity and thus offering ways to surpass the ill-based network of globalization the 21st century has been experiencing, while remaining akin to the modern man. See Avatar, The Hub, XR and LVLUP toolkits for further insights. Also, as disclosed by the discussions tab [8], and in the introduction, Big Data for Sustainable Development is the overall goal of this research.

It represents premier reference work on Artificial Intelligence [9] [10], the utilization of infrastructure tools and technical communication to the world wide web, through open collaboration. Setting outstanding goals to create an engine capable shortening code to its most efficient format yet seen, it aims to solve hallucination and achieve syntaxial order to NLP speech to achieve true interpersonal communication between human and machine, while in its grand scope it articulates sensorial perceptions of a new UI dimension where Business may thrive.

  • This methodology is based on Thread & Tradition [11] [12].
  • It relies on ONU SDG goals to comprehend that digital worlds can allow humans to overcome poverty, overpopulation, and other lingering issues of the current era, by relying on free space [13] as means to expand our societal areas of contact [14] [15].
  • Inherently, the work offered by this Encyclopedia offers great insight on the development segment of A.I. Notably, as far as we can tell, the bubble surrounding this market due to the negligence of some few looking to profit from it may end somewhere around the lines of Artificial, as it is not the end of the path, but rather the beginning of it.

Final Considerations

Lorem Ipsum

Notes and References

  1. ↑ Also see Copyrights.
  2. ↑ It is stated that AGX—seen below the title, recurs throughout living beings as rituals of power, encompassing unforeseen, almost magical, qualities of these operators, that may regard to the communication barrier Science has been having on regards to Spiritualism. i.e., the oversimplification of their usage, devoid of tradition.
  3. ↑ 3rd → 6th and 9th. These topics are, in sum, available for machines to create a basal language layer, after establishing an operating theory of mind. Furthermore, the enumeration represents the applicable disciplines from the available table of contents, seen below trough the title ´Disciplines´.
  4. ↑ Rather than epistemological and historical (or in the case of number 7, algorithmic) source
  5. ↑ Defining the spirit of an era is an arduous task, as it emerges through the uphill trajectory of its development, often in opposition to a particular class of objects of appreciation. However, the defining challenge of the modern world, shaped by globalization, is that the power of knowledge itself dulls the process of discovery, leading to meta-conflicts—battles not over the objects of appreciation, but over knowledge as an end in itself. The psychological warfare born from the emergence of duality and paradox disorients the mind, forcing individuals to reconcile conflicting perspectives. It is no coincidence that spirituality has declined, as civilizations increasingly exposed to the ever-seeing eye of the internet become more susceptible to the erosion of introspective and metaphysical pursuits.
  6. ↑ That of Atheism, Occidentalism, and furthermore the geographical pivot of history.
  7. ↑ Ducarme, F., & Couvet, D. (2020). What does 'nature' mean? Palgrave Communications, 6, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.
  8. ↑ Furthermore, authors are encouraged to create, participate and edit the available discussion tabs of Zeus.
  9. ↑ AI and Philosophy: Exploring the Complex Relationship between Worldviews and Technology Development for an Inclusive and Ethical Future. SSRN. December 6, 2023. Retrieved on February 5, 2025.
  10. ↑ Is Philosophy the Next LLM Training Frontier?. MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. December 3, 2024. Retrieved in February 5, 2025
  11. ↑ The engine is powered by a novelty language system based on the evolution of comprehension of time (i.e., not as in relativity, but rather of ancient wisdom), that runs on threaded code to transfer situation comprehensive information, as well as a theory of mind. They must be complex and demanding tasks, not suitable for computers to run, if not otherwise processed by the compiler presented by this engine.
  12. ↑ Furthermore, Alchetypes must be a way to extract the theory of mind from the environment and dynamically extrapolate their Archetypes into a comprehensible, marketable, insightful and playful manner.
  13. ↑ Free space refers to areas used by society that categorize on leisure, or otherwise, non-categorized at all. They oftentimes are limited by, if not exclusive to transit, resting, or serve as infrastructure for trivial objects and nature. Generally, can be described as lacking consistent qualities of life.
  14. ↑ Lee, L.-H., Braud, T., Zhou, P., Wang, L., Xu, D., Lin, Z., Kumar, A., Bermejo, C., & Hui, P. (2021). The Metaverse: Survey, trends, novel pipeline ecosystem & future directions. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 51(11), 4854–4875. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2021.3053212
  15. ↑ Jauhiainen, J. S. (2024). The Metaverse: Innovations and generative AI. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 8(3), 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2024.04.004
Retrieved from "https://xadrez.store/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=467"